Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you want to start on Sunday at QB?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

So, if Teddy can't go or even if he can, who do you want to see start?

PJ has looked awful when he has come in, but it's not fair at all to judge him on those dire circumstances.

Grier looked bad here, but again it's not fair to judge him based solely on those circumstances. 

 

What would be your preference? I'm good either way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as Not Teddy is marching us towards a better pick, it’s fine with me. I just don’t want us having feel good wins in the next 5 games because 4 of them are direct competition for a better pick. I don’t believe beating the Broncos will magically give us more confidence in 2022 as we are trying to get the #1 seed. I’d rather get the QB we want than have to pick a CB because we beat the Broncos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Teddy to be healthy because he's a great dude. And if he's healthy he's definitely starting. If he's not healthy I say go with Walker. We have seen Grier start but we haven't seen PJ start while going through practice as the presumed starter. He has not looked good at all in the limited snaps he's come in for, but I'd say give him a shot if Teddy is out. Though, it really doesn't matter at all. We aren't winning with Grier or PJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

teddy bridgewater. he's the quarterback for now and he's the quarterback next season at least based on his play. he's on pace to be the first quarterback not named drew brees to complete 72% or more of his passes in a season and he's done it without CMC and without a TE, which is even more important in my estimation. he's a legitimate starting quarterback. he decisively answered a lot of questions this year by getting this team as close to competitive as they were offensively with as bad as they were with personnel and should be substantially better as he enters the prime years of effectiveness for quarterbacks which is the 28-32 range.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Popsickle said:

This man gets it! He doesn’t want to win any games!!!

The season slipped away when we lost to the Bears. Realistically, if they don’t want to win any more games - Walker or Grier should be just fine as starters. 
 

id like to see them sign Colin just to piss off the snowflakes that “support” the Panthers but if they want to lose games the answer is.....wait for it.....already on the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Teddy if Teddy can play. 

2.  PJ Walker

3.  Curtis Samuel wildcat game 

4.  Fake punt every offensive possession

5. maybe Will

* I care about being entertained.  These offer the most entertaining possibilities from a viewer perspective IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...