Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers to fine Covid-19 Crew


MHS831

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

CYA move by the Panthers. We don't need to lose a draft pick over this. I don't care about Tepper's wallet. Any fine levied by the NFL would be the equivalent of fining the average person a few bucks.

Yep, we already lose picks employing Hurney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ncstatekwi said:

Idiots....sit all players who violated the protocol and jeopardized the team!!  Clearly they are putting themselves first and not thinking about the team!

This sentence is applicable to about 40% of America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers are not in any danger of a fine from the league for this incident!  The situations are completely different.

The fines for the Saints and Raiders were for violations of the NFL policy surrounding official team activities.  In the Saints case it was during post game events.  For the Raiders, it was an aggregation of violations, again, during the events of an NFL game day.

Nothing about what happened to the Panthers falls under that umbrella.  It wasn't at an official team event, it wasn't at their facilities.  The team can try to fine the players, but the NFLPA will probably file a protest, and probably win.  The team cannot tell it's players what to do on their own time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

CYA move by the Panthers. We don't need to lose a draft pick over this. I don't care about Tepper's wallet. Any fine levied by the NFL would be the equivalent of fining the average person a few bucks.

Not sure. Seems like the violation fell way short of the ones the NFL has fined to this point; mostly egregious and/or repeat violations. By precedent, even a fine seems unlikely, draft pick forfeiture much less so. If anything I wonder if the Panthers making a bigger deal of it is drawing unnecessary attention. Whereas a smattering of positive cases on a team has become par for the course these days and probably would barely raise an eye, particularly during a bye week, now suddenly we're throwing ourselves back in the spotlight with a national story. I still think either way we probably won't hear anything else from the league, but I suspect this is more of the organization trying to assert zero tolerance to discourage any future offenses that could have bigger consequences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has improved each season, fwiw, statistically.  His slope is rising.  (Not to say I am high on him--I am not, but I have not given up on him--nor have I given up on XL, but damn he pisses me off)  CJ's slope is descending.   I was never a Penix fan.  Never, I say!    
    • That is definitely the down side of all this--on paper, I would offer up a second rounder for him if he passed my interviews.  He has already gone through (seriously?) a treatment program for gambling addiction.  I just see him as a first round talent that we could get with a second rounder.  If I liked Bryce and felt good about paying him $50m per, I would not touch Sorsby.  If Bryce regresses or stays the same--he is going to expect to be paid.  Sorsby, in my view, has a better long-term future as an NFL QB.  He is big, mobile, has good arm strength, and makes wise decisions (on the field) with the football.  He is a great dual threat, RPO QB.   I think he is a perfect solution for the backup qb position and insurance for Bryce should he get injured or suck.  Pickett?  King?  yikes. 
    • Hard to say--they are very unpredictable--this article came out last night---after our comments:  (ESPN)   How has the NFL approached NCAA players with gambling violations in the past? David Purdum, sports betting reporter: Quarterback Hunter Dekkers and wide receiver Kayshon Boutte were found to have committed gambling violations while playing college football, and both were allowed to pursue NFL careers. Dekkers was the projected starting quarterback at Iowa State but was ruled ineligible ahead of the 2023 season after an investigation found he had bet on at least one game involving the Cyclones (among other wagers that violated NCAA bylaws). The bet was just $15 on Iowa State to beat Oklahoma State in a 2021 game in which he did not play, but it led to the end of his Division I career. He played one season at Iowa Western Community College in 2024 before signing with the Saints as an undrafted free agent, and he spent last season on the practice squad. Boutte was arrested in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in January 2024 on charges of underage betting while at LSU. The arrest came roughly eight months after he had been drafted in Round 6 by the Patriots, and the charges were ultimately dropped. According to police, Boutte placed more than 8,900 wagers from April 2022 to May 2023, including betting on at least 17 college football games -- at least six of which involved LSU during that span. The NFL did not discipline Boutte.
×
×
  • Create New...