Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Regarding draft scenarios


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, DFive said:

We’ll make Haskins look like a future HoFer just like we do to all struggling QBs. Drew Lock had his best game of the season against us. Doesn’t matter what trash is at QB, our D will make them look like a franchise QB. 

Didn’t we make him look excellent last year when they beat us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DFive said:

We’ll make Haskins look like a future HoFer just like we do to all struggling QBs. Drew Lock had his best game of the season against us. Doesn’t matter what trash is at QB, our D will make them look like a franchise QB. 

Yet we made A Rod look average last night 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Fair to point out that was a different coaching staff.

Actually, it's pretty much the coaching staff we'll be facing on the other side.

We made Lock look like a stud last week. We’ve been doing that a lot the last 3 years. It’s why I’m not a Parsons fan in the draft if we don’t like a QB. We need better CBs first. Carter, Thompson and Chinn seem solid. Pride, Elder, Donte and rookie RBs isn’t the best group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

We made Lock look like a stud last week. We’ve been doing that a lot the last 3 years. It’s why I’m not a Parsons fan in the draft if we don’t like a QB. We need better CBs first. Carter, Thompson and Chinn seem solid. Pride, Elder, Donte and rookie RBs isn’t the best group.

That's fair, but you also have to acknowledge that we did well against Aaron Rodgers last night.

An argument could be made that we play up, or down, to our competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

He was 13 of 25 for 147, sacked 5 times, and fumbled twice. Guice and Peterson ran all over us.

Yep, hence my ?. I remembered him starting and not looking bad, especially in the second half when the scored 2 more TDs and a FG, but it was the running game, which was one of their weak spots, burying us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's fair, but you also have to acknowledge that we did well against Aaron Rodgers last night.

An argument could be made that we play up, or down, to our competition.

We do. I do think GB eased up a bit when they were up 21-3. Never smart to do as you lose momentum. Ron was the best at that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

We do. I do think GB eased up a bit when they were up 21-3. Never smart to do as you lose momentum. Ron was the best at that. 

I kinda got that impression too.

Aaron Rodgers postgame comments would also lend to the idea that they didn't take us very seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...