Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones


saX man

The QB Poll: Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones  

197 members have voted

  1. 1. Let's say we have the choice of any of these guys...who's your pick? Give your reasons/team fit/scheme fit/dry your beans

    • Justin Fields, Ohio State, 6'3 228
      71
    • Zach Wilson, BYU, 6'3 210
      62
    • Trey Lance, NDSU, 6'4 226
      46
    • Kyle Trask, Florida, 6'5 240
      10
    • Mac Jones, Bama, 6'3 214
      8


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Varking said:

Yeah... it didn’t back what you said though. 

bro you deadass just like to argue.

I said OSU produces shitty QB's. Haskins, Jones, Miller, Smith, all prime examples - and these were some of their highest drafted guys.

period, that's my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

bro you deadass just like to argue.

I said OSU produces shitty QB's. Haskins, Jones, Miller, Smith, all prime examples - and these were some of their highest drafted guys.

period, that's my opinion. 

Be more clear in your wording in the future then. The counterpoint, which you ignored, was Burrow spent three years at OSU. And schools that typically produce awful QBs like Oregon and Alabama have done very well breaking that trend recently. 

If how you analyze a player is to compare them to previous QBs at the same college you’d miss out on so many great players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

Be more clear in your wording in the future then. The counterpoint, which you ignored, was Burrow spent three years at OSU. And schools that typically produce awful QBs like Oregon and Alabama have done very well breaking that trend recently. 

If how you analyze a player is to compare them to previous QBs at the same college you’d miss out on so many great players. 

Burrow wouldn't be anything without Brady and having two of the best college receivers ever. 

the jury is still out on Tua, Hurts and Herbert for all we know.

fact is that OSU hasn't produced anyone special at QB, and my opinion is that I don't want to be the one to take a risk and break the trend.

can't be any more clear than that. like I said, you just like to post up here an argue opinions - go head and get that last word in fam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

Burrow wouldn't be anything without Brady and having two of the best college receivers ever. 

the jury is still out on Tua, Hurts and Herbert for all we know.

fact is that OSU hasn't produced anyone special at QB, and my opinion is that I don't want to be the one to take a risk and break the trend.

can't be any more clear than that. like I said, you just like to post up here an argue opinions - go head and get that last word in fam.

So much weird logic in here. If you don’t take risks you don’t get rewarded. As for the post up here and argue opinions, that’s literally what you are doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

Same. I like Wilson but I don’t believe he’s as good as Rattler will be. 

Idk about lawrence, but def Wilson, Fields and anyone else this year. Hence why I am pro saving our first round draft pick on someone who will make a great return on investment, then seeing if Darnold is actually trash or was it the Jets. If he's trash, then find someone actually elite next year. With covid and everything, it's so hard to judge the other QBs. Fields and Lance don't have enough on tape. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...