Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper said he will be the tiebreaker if needed


NAS

Recommended Posts

I like that Tepper is agressive in choosing the right folks to build a winning organization , but I really don’t want him meddling in roster decisions or who we draft. I didn’t like hearing he may have to be the tiebreaker between Rhule and the new GM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a couple of choices on that front. Either you give one guy full power or you step in yourself, but only when necessary.

In the past, the guy at the top was about always the GM, but more and more these days coaches have a higher level of influence. That's where you get guys like Matt Rhule who say they're not just about X's and O's.

The middle ground for me is having an owner who steps in when needed, but only if he's asked. I understand that he owns the team, but he should also understand that doesn't make him a smart football guy. He's the guy who hires smart football guys and lets them do their jobs.

So basically, stay out of the day to day stuff, but step in if your people can't come to a consensus.

And if your people hardly ever come to a consensus, find new people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

I like that Tepper is agressive in choosing the right folks to build a winning organization , but I really don’t want him meddling in roster decisions or who we draft. I didn’t like hearing he may have to be the tiebreaker between Rhule and the new GM. 

What do you suggest? Paper rock scissors two out of three?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most teams OLs are dealing with injuries at the end of the season. So by that token all QB play should be horrific across the board, but it's not.  Using the OL as an excuse anytime a QB plays bad is just lazy.  This is the same OL when Bryce had his good games not so long ago.  So do they suck just when Bryce does bad? Obviously they played well enough when y'all were doing your victory laps and saying 'you told us Bryce was the man' in the victories. It goes back to my stance with Bryce all along...he's a low end starting QB.  He'd be a great backup. Bryce is going to have a few really nice games a season at this point in his career, with a few WTF games mixed in, but very middling overall.
    • Good Lord! I bet the O-line play wasn't the worst since 1980.  And @thebdawg, injuries absolutely can make for a bad showing at the end of the day. That's not an excuse, it's just a fact.
    • Defense stepped up after that and held them to a FG. Offense proceeded to turn it over on downs right after.  Was it an incredibly dumb penalty, of course it was. The defense played their asses off though and got zero help from the offense. If you force them to punt at that point instead of the penalty do you really think the offense does anything differently?
×
×
  • Create New...