Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Draft Network Mock Draft(Panthers Trade up to 3)


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/2021-nfl-mock-draft-marino-4.0

Quote

TRADE: Carolina receives 3rd overall pick from Miami in exchange for 8th overall pick, 72nd overall pick, 2022 first-round pick.

The Panthers showed some promise in Year 1 of the Matt Rhule era and the next phase of the rebuilding process for Carolina is finding its next franchise quarterback. In striking distance to land an exciting new option, the Panthers should be thinking about a move up the board. With Miami being only one year removed from drafting Tua Tagovailoa with the No. 5 overall selection and earning the No. 3 pick courtesy of the Laremy Tunsil trade and a poor season from the Texans, trading back to build the talent around Tagovailoa is a wise move. The Dolphins and Panthers are perfect trade partners. Wilson is a dynamic quarterback prospect that fits nicely with how the NFL game is trending and would provide Carolina with a potential difference-maker at the position. With a fairly complete set of weapons already in place and all the investments made on the defensive side of the football, Carolina is ready to pick a quarterback high in the draft.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Honestly I think you could get away with 2021 #8 and #40 to make that trade and now worry about 2022.

100% disagree. There are going to be a lot of teams gunning for that pick and a future 1st will be a bare minimum. 

Denver, San Francisco, New England, Detroit, Washington, Chicago are all candidates to trade up, IMO. There are so many QB needy teams and this is a very, very valuable draft to snag a QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

We really don't need a new thread for every new mock draft that gets released

Yeah, because we need more threads about Teddy's post game comments or every new GM candidate. 

It's the offseason, I suggest you hibernate if you don't want to see reach threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Huddler said:

If its for our franchise guy who will win SBs, then its worth it.

 

kinda annoying beating Washington cost us a 1st round pick .. 

I think a lot is going to depend on how all these QB evaluations pan out. There is a pretty big pool of first round caliber QB's(Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance, Jones, Trask). Does a guy like Wilson or Lance fall? Does Fields fall? Does Jones shoot up the boards? 

It's really tough to say at the moment. These boards are 98% pure speculation and less about actual in depth evaluation and mining team sources. I will say that TDN does some of the best prospect evaluation around, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

If its for our franchise guy who will win SBs, then its worth it.

 

kinda annoying beating Washington cost us a 1st round pick .. 

Yep, the same people who didn’t want us to tank might be ok with trading up. There’s a reason why us tankers didn’t want to win any games. Wouldn’t it be nice to have pick 3 already and also be able to keep pick 72 and 2021 first? I mean if we were playoff teams already like KC and Houston were, trading a future first to get the one piece (QB) you needed isn’t a bad trade off, especially when you feel that future first will be a late first. I don’t think our 2021 pick will be a late first so honestly I don’t want to trade up unless we can get Fields or Wilson and we feel like they are our new healthy Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...