Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Draft Network Mock Draft(Panthers Trade up to 3)


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Brutal.

Guess they haven't looked at the rest of the roster if they think we can afford to give up that much Draft capital. 

That really just depends on if you really think he is "The Guy." To get a franchise QB, that is an extremely small price to pay. 

To get a JAG, that is the kind of trade up that will put your new GM on the hot seat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

100% disagree. There are going to be a lot of teams gunning for that pick and a future 1st will be a bare minimum. 

Denver, San Francisco, New England, Detroit, Washington, Chicago are all candidates to trade up, IMO. There are so many QB needy teams and this is a very, very valuable draft to snag a QB. 

No way do we give up multiple draft picks for a guy like Wilson who isnt a slam dunk. Truth is we are just as likely to find a franchise guy at 8 as we are at 5 or lower. There is no need to panic and give up the farm when many of these top guys are similar in ability. I want the guy who can best run our system and will be there at 8. All of the tankers who seem in panic mode might think trading up is a good decision but countless drafts suggest that it is not smart given the number of QBs this year with similar grades and skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

No way do we give up multiple draft picks for a guy like Wilson who isnt a slam dunk. Truth is we are just as likely to find a franchise guy at 8 as we are at 5 or lower. There is no need to panic and give up the farm when many of these top guys are similar in ability. I want the guy who can best run our system and will be there at 8. All of the tankers who seem in panic mode might think trading up is a good decision but countless drafts suggest that it is not smart given the number of QBs this year with similar grades and skill.

I have no idea what we are going to do. It is way too early in the process to know. I think it is possible we trade up for a QB depending on the situation. We will be looking at a new GM and also we have no idea how the evaluation of this QB class will play out. 

I definitely don't think it is impossible we trade up for a QB and Miami is an interesting choice they made because they are one of those teams that isn't going to draft a QB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine if he was a bust in that trade up , sweet Jesus .

If he's good though that trade would be more than worth it, the only thing in that deal that is a gut punch is giving up  next year's first . 

Alot of people will say it's not worth it to make a move like that unless it's for Fields or Lawrence. Only time will tell in the end.

The best situation to hope for is a 2017 ish draft where a couple of good qbs fall (mahomes and watson fell to 10 and 12 that year ).  

Jags will get Lawrence but pretty much every other team in front of us doesn't NEED a QB. Especially Atlanta and Detroit . With the only wild card being the change in their staffs making them want to get a young qb to groom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I have no idea what we are going to do. It is way too early in the process to know. I think it is possible we trade up for a QB depending on the situation. We will be looking at a new GM and also we have no idea how the evaluation of this QB class will play out. 

I definitely don't think it is impossible we trade up for a QB and Miami is an interesting choice they made because they are one of those teams that isn't going to draft a QB.

 

Given that Rhule will run the draft and wanted to trade back for more picks last year, I doubt he will go the opposite way this time unless he feels strongly about one guy over the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

Given that Rhule will run the draft and wanted to trade back for more picks lady year, I doubt he will go the opposite way this time unless he feels strongly about one guy over the rest.

That is an awful lot of definitive statements based on zero information. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Imagine if he was a bust in that trade up , sweet Jesus .

If he's good though that trade would be more than worth it, the only thing in that deal that is a gut punch is giving up  next year's first . 

Alot of people will say it's not worth it to make a move like that unless it's for Fields or Lawrence. Only time will tell in the end.

100%. That is the thing about making that trade up, you have to be pretty damn sure. If not.....new GM, welcome to the hot seat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That is an awful lot of definitive statements based on zero information. 

What is definitive about I doubt he will trade up? Or did you question he wanted to trade back last year which seems pretty well established. Or perhaps that given we don't have a GM yet and it only 3 months away from the draft that Rhule will be making the selections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...