Haskins...or Heinicke?

[Mr. Scot 75,290]

Scott Fowler raises the question...

 

[LinvilleGorge 52,126]

I say neither. Truth he told, I think Heinicke basically caught lightning in a bottle last night with that performance. We're already dedicated to giving Teddy $20M next year whether he's on the roster or not and there's a very good chance we'll have a top 10 rookie at QB too.

Heinicke will likely be re-signed in Washington and maybe even given a chance to compete for the starting job next year. Not like they have much of anything else.

[MHS831 16,098]

What has happened to journalism?

 

[Moo Daeng 5,448]

I'd rather the next Heineke type be the 3rd qb than either of them.

[Davidson Deac II 7,275]

Neither one really.  But if forced to choose between the two, it would be Taylor all day.  Reality is that the only reason Haskins is getting a look is that to many people (including some GM's) are obsessed with first round draft picks.  Its clear in hindsight that he shouldn't have been a first round pick.  

[t96 24,455]

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I say neither. Truth he told, I think Heinicke basically caught lightning in a bottle last night with that performance. We're already dedicated to giving Teddy $20M next year whether he's on the roster or not and there's a very good chance we'll have a top 10 rookie at QB too.

Heinicke will likely be re-signed in Washington and maybe even given a chance to compete for the starting job next year. Not like they have much of anything else.

Yeah no interest in Heinicke whatsoever. I don’t want Haskins either but atleast he does have the upside that made him a top 15 pick just a few years ago. Heinicke will never be a starter and we need to focus on looking for our franchise starting QB before thinking about a long term backup.

[GOAT 584]

Heineke is being cancelled because of his political views.

[Zod 669,775]

Heineke is a RFA not a UFA. 

[Moo Daeng 5,448]

3 minutes ago, Zod said:

Heineke is a RFA not a UFA. 

Nope

[Zod 669,775]

Just now, Moo Daeng said:

Nope

I read this morning that he was. Perhaps the article was wrong.

[Mr. Scot 75,290]

5 minutes ago, Zod said:

I read this morning that he was. Perhaps the article was wrong.

He doesn't have a lot of years to his credit so I'd imagine it's possible.

A couple of Washington reporters have confirmed he'd like to stay up there though, and teammates seem to like the idea.

 

[Mr. Scot 75,290]

Also...damn!

 

[GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER 19,304]

haskins has better career numbers and he’s 4 years younger. with a 23 year old former first round pick as your backup the hope is that he can be a developmental project. with taylor heinicke as your backup you’re locked into eating up a roster spot with a JAG. you’re not winning poo with either so you might as well take the long view or alternatively sign neither of them.

[djp14 495]

Has Heinicke ever made it through an entire game?