Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Haskins...or Heinicke?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

I say neither. Truth he told, I think Heinicke basically caught lightning in a bottle last night with that performance. We're already dedicated to giving Teddy $20M next year whether he's on the roster or not and there's a very good chance we'll have a top 10 rookie at QB too.

Heinicke will likely be re-signed in Washington and maybe even given a chance to compete for the starting job next year. Not like they have much of anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I say neither. Truth he told, I think Heinicke basically caught lightning in a bottle last night with that performance. We're already dedicated to giving Teddy $20M next year whether he's on the roster or not and there's a very good chance we'll have a top 10 rookie at QB too.

Heinicke will likely be re-signed in Washington and maybe even given a chance to compete for the starting job next year. Not like they have much of anything else.

Yeah no interest in Heinicke whatsoever. I don’t want Haskins either but atleast he does have the upside that made him a top 15 pick just a few years ago. Heinicke will never be a starter and we need to focus on looking for our franchise starting QB before thinking about a long term backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, Zod said:

I read this morning that he was. Perhaps the article was wrong.

He doesn't have a lot of years to his credit so I'd imagine it's possible.

A couple of Washington reporters have confirmed he'd like to stay up there though, and teammates seem to like the idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER Newbie

GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER

Posted
Posted

haskins has better career numbers and he’s 4 years younger. with a 23 year old former first round pick as your backup the hope is that he can be a developmental project. with taylor heinicke as your backup you’re locked into eating up a roster spot with a JAG. you’re not winning poo with either so you might as well take the long view or alternatively sign neither of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cardiackat88.
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By cardiackat88. · Posted

      Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...