Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 Apparent Finalists for the GM Position


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Charlotte_Sports_Hub said:

According to Ian Rapoport, the Panthers have lined up 3 candidates for a second interview: Adam Peters (49ers), Monti Ossenfort (Titans), and Scott Fitterer (Seahawks). These apparently seem to be the finalists for the General Manager position. 

Based on this and earlier reports, it seems that Tepper is deferring to Matt Rhule's choices for the GM spot, and all of them have familiar connections to Rhule. The analytical guy that Tepper wants could come from another source. 

Don't know if it matters, but it's interesting that 2 out of the 3 finalists come from the Bill Walsh/West Coast style of team building, and one (Monti) is from the Bill Parcells/Belichick school of team building.

Still wish they'd bring in Joe Schoen, but I've resigned to these 3 and would be happy with any of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, blueandblackattack said:

Don't know if it matters, but it's interesting that 2 out of the 3 finalists come from the Bill Walsh/West Coast style of team building, and one (Monti) is from the Bill Parcells/Belichick school of team building.

Still wish they'd bring in Joe Schoen, but I've resigned to these 3 and would be happy with any of them.

Correction, Monti is from Parcells school, Fitterer from Bill Walsh school and Peters has influences in both (Patriots/Broncos/49ers). I like that diversity of different team building skillsets, maybe I'm rooting for Peters after all.

But don't you guys think with so much history that the power dynamic will be skewed? Personal relationships, especially from coach to player, might not make Peters fight as hard for a player he likes if Rhule doesn't agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...