Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell


Recommended Posts

In my opinion, Sam Howell is better than both Zach Wilson and Trey Lance. I would potentially be in favor of trading back a lot, acquiring multiple first round picks and day 2 picks in order to get a potential haul ready to trade up for the number 1 overall slot next year. Sam Howell would not only be a fan favorite but could make a difference better than both Wilson and Lance. 

 

Would y'all be willing to wait a year for Howell? I certainly would. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Charlotte_Sports_Hub said:

In my opinion, Sam Howell is better than both Zach Wilson and Trey Lance. I would potentially be in favor of trading back a lot, acquiring multiple first round picks and day 2 picks in order to get a potential haul ready to trade up for the number 1 overall slot next year. Sam Howell would not only be a fan favorite but could make a difference better than both Wilson and Lance. 

 

Would y'all be willing to wait a year for Howell? I certainly would. 

There will still be a lot of QB needy teams next year.

One of those will have the #1 pick. Betting they will move off of it for any price is a long shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Charlotte_Sports_Hub said:

In my opinion, Sam Howell is better than both Zach Wilson and Trey Lance. I would potentially be in favor of trading back a lot, acquiring multiple first round picks and day 2 picks in order to get a potential haul ready to trade up for the number 1 overall slot next year. Sam Howell would not only be a fan favorite but could make a difference better than both Wilson and Lance. 

 

Would y'all be willing to wait a year for Howell? I certainly would. 

Lance's ceiling is far higher than Howell's. I probably like Howell a bit more than Wilson, currently. 

Trying to trade into a far, far, far, far, far weaker QB draft and hope you get a player isn't smart. The idea of targeting a player that may be a top 10 player in the NEXT draft isn't very logical.

You make decisions on THIS draft based on THIS draft, not on who may or may not be in the next one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Howell looks like he’s going to be great. Far better than anyone not named Lawrence this year (and maybe better than Lawrence) and I’m not a UNC stan, I don’t really follow any college ball until draft season. But based on the videos I’ve watched of all the top prospects this year and Howell, Howell is ridiculously impressive. 
 

With that said, it’s unlikely we’d be able to accrue enough draft capital to be able to move up and get him next year unless Teddy is our QB again and sinks out season even worse next year than he did this year. And by that point I don’t know how much I’d be able to stomach of football any more. I’d rather go get Wilson this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say say even if we do that, trade back and obtain multiple 1st round picks (let's say 2 max)...how do we even know that the team with the #1 overall pick would be willing to trade instead of getting their own QB of the future.  Would you trade down from the #1 pick instead of getting your future QB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howell makes reads, has good footwork, good pocket presence, can make all the throws from fastballs to touch passes and has the biggest arm I’ve seen in a while. The ball just leaps off his hands. The only QB this year that has that combination of skills is Lawrence, and he doesn’t have the arm Howell does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...