Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule press conference

Captain Morgan

By Captain Morgan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Captain Morgan Grand Master

Captain Morgan

Posted
Posted (edited)
Matt Rhule, on his virtual presser, about the Panthers interviewing FIFTEEN candidates: I thought it was brilliant. For a first-year NFL coach, for a third-year owner to talk to people who work for all those teams? I would have paid for it.
 
 
 
Matt Rhule says he doesn't want to comment on any specific players. "Each and everyday we have to find a way to get better and improve the roster...I think we're going to continue to try to churn."
 
 
Matt Rhule says anything can happen as far as Joe Brady getting a job. But if he is in fact back: "I'm excited to have him back next year."
 
 
 
 
Matt Rhule said he was really happy for the assistant coaches that go jobs elsewhere. He wanted them back. But he was happy for them.
Edited by Captain Morgan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kass Mentor

kass

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Rhule told Joe Person he likes having more picks because you have a better chance of hitting on your picks.

In the process, he basically confirmed that he wanted to trade down last year. 

I thought the same thing. But then he mentioned, in his answer on the Combine question. That the value of the combine was to meet the players and get to know them, he mentioned Derrick Brown specific and only him, in retrospect, as someone he would love to get the opportunity to coach.

Not sure that answer change anything. He could still wanted to trade down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Rhule told Joe Person he likes having more picks because you have a better chance of hitting on your picks.

In the process, he basically confirmed that he wanted to trade down last year. 

Maybe I am wrong but I think we could of gotten Derrick Brown around 15th if we wanted. Unless the Cardinals were going to take him then I understand staying pat. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...