Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scenario: Poll inside.


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Texans want one, who's going?  

120 members have voted

  1. 1. Texans want to deal Watson for a couple of firsts and one of these players, who's going to Houston?

    • Christian McCaffery
      70
    • D.J. Moore
      45
    • Brian Burns
      7


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Ooof. I would want to keep Chinn out of that deal but positional value does dictate you are right about that. I'd probably offer up Brown before I would Moore, though.

I like Moore more than Brown but Brown has more time on rookie deal.

Cap saved is cap I can spend to upgrade a different position. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I'd send CMC. They'd probably want Moore or Burns.

The reason I chose Moore is that he needs a new contract soon and it’s somewhere we can save money too. If we dealt McCaffrey we’d still eat a ton of that cap hit and then we’d definitely have to give Moore a huge contract or we’d have very few weapons for Watson...

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

The reason I chose Moore is that he needs a new contract soon and it’s somewhere we can save money too. If we dealt McCaffrey we’d still eat a ton of that cap hit and then we’d definitely have to give Moore a huge contract or we’d have very few weapons for Watson...

Yeah, the pre-June 1st cap hit would be pretty rough. But, then again they would be getting murdered in the cap hit too for trading Deshaun.

But getting rid of Moore would also immediately rob Watson of his biggest weapon.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...