Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South Success


WarHeel
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 of the last 6 years has seen NFC South teams compete in the Super Bowl. Albeit, both Carolina and ATL didn’t come away with a win, Brady and the Bucs will have a chance to do what they couldn’t. 
 

I figured this was a telling stat of the competition we have had to endure the last few years and perhaps points to a bit of our mediocrity as well. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Saints were easily the best team during this span and never made it.  😄

Yeah pretty hilarious. Our 2015 was definitely the best individual season among NFCS teams in that timespan, but the Aints have had 4 straight seasons where they were among the top 2 favored NFC teams to make the SB and came up short every time haha. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LegioX said:

Wonder if Brady will retire if he wins SB this year. 

Highly doubt it, he's already said he's playing next year I think and why would he retire at this point? Plus they won't win, AFC teams and coaches left are way better than Arians and the Bucs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...