Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading Up to 3 or 5 - A Look Into the Potential Cost**


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

I personally want Lance at 8, but have serious concerns about him being there. 

After seeing how aggressive we were and the overpay that our FO was willing to toss out for Stafford, I am now thinking Tepper wants "their QB" and will move up to 2 or 3 to do it. Won't cost as much as DW and we get a franchise signal caller while not losing as many assets. 

"Hoping" that a QB makes it to 8 doesn't seem like Tepper's MO currently and we probably won't be drafting this high for awhile.

2021 is our year to strike, and Tepper is about to whip out those brass marbles, IMO.

Edited by Soul Rebel
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Future draft picks are usually valued one round lower according to the chart.  For example a 2022 1st is valued somewhat close to a current 1st.  Where in the 1st round is somewhat dependent on who you are trading with but for this example lets go to the middle, pick 16.

2021 1st (3rd overall) = 2200

2021 1st (8th overall) = 1400

2021 2nd (39th overall) = 510

2022 1st (16th overall) = 420

1400+510+420=2330

You have to expect some overpay going for a QB.  Also they might be more interested in future first than some combination of later picks this year.

So, 2021 1st, 2021 2nd,  and 2022 1st probably gets you in the ballpark of what it would take to trade up to 3 this year.  When you look at that you kind of realize why they were willing to give up the 8th this year to get Stafford.

Personally I would try to save next years 1st by trying to include a player.

Something like, 2021 1st, CMC, and 2022 2nd.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Future draft picks are usually valued one round lower according to the chart.  For example a 2022 1st is valued somewhat close to a current 1st.  Where in the 1st round is somewhat dependent on who you are trading with but for this example lets go to the middle, pick 16.

2021 1st (3rd overall) = 2200

2021 1st (8th overall) = 1400

2021 2nd (39th overall) = 510

2022 1st (16th overall) = 420

1400+510+420=2330

You have to expect some overpay going for a QB.  Also they might be more interested in future first than some combination of later picks this year.

So, 2021 1st, 2021 2nd,  and 2022 1st probably gets you in the ballpark of what it would take to trade up to 3 this year.  When you look at that you kind of realize why they were willing to give up the 8th this year to get Stafford.

Personally I would try to save next years 1st by trying to include a player.

Something like, 2021 1st, CMC, and 2022 2nd.

 

I def want to hold onto this year's 2nd. The ability to add a very, very good OT or IOL with that pick is crucial to build around Moton on that OL and protect that rookie QB.

Moving #8 (which ideally would be a QB selection), next year's 1st and 2nd would hopefully be enough.

Keeping CMC with a QB on a 5-yr rookie deal and losing Samuel is important. We probably find a cheaper WR3 in FA, but CMC is our slot WR. Especially with Bonnafon and Smith that can tote the rock 5-10 times a game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2021 at 10:38 AM, SetfreexX said:

With pick 8, you'd have to assume Lawrence / Wilson or Fields go 1 and 2 based on early mocks / media commentary. 

So that means you'd need to get to MIA at 3, or CIN at 5. ATL is at #4 and could be in the market to draft an heir apparent to Ryan, but there's been no talk that has leaked yet, so let's assume for now their interest is elsewhere. 

Current Panther Draft picks (Provided by): http://www.tankathon.com/nfl/full_draft

1st - 8

2nd - 39

3rd - 73

4th - 104

5th - 135

6th - 169

7th - N/A

I will see if I can locate our comps, as I don't think they have been finalized yet**

At 3 or 5, you're likely looking at Fields / Wilson or Lance...

Pick Value (Provided by): https://walterfootball.com/draftchart.php

#3 is worth 2,200 - Swap our 1st, and give up our 2, 39th overall (510), and 3, 73rd overall (225) = 2135

(Would likely see a day 3 added in there, or a future day 2 potentially)

#5 is worth 1,700 - Swap our first, and give up our 3, 73rd overall (225), and 4 (86) = 1,711 

Our pick at #8 is worth 1,400

I think it’s going to be more like a #1 next year to get to top 3 picks. Multiple suitors means $$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much difference in Wilson or Fields and if we are talking battle tested I like Fields more.  Plus it keeps us from worrying about that shoulder surgery Wilson had.

I really like Fields....question is what keeps him from being a franchise guy?  He doesn’t have Cams amazing personality but otherwise he is extremely good and word is he is a perfectionist who lives for the game.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a trade up scenario give me Fields, has an NFL ready frame (Wilson is built similar to Teddy), has the big arm, and elite athleticism. Should allow for more offensive variety allowing pressure to be taken off of what is likely to be a below average OL next year with all the holes we have. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...