Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NO TO WATSON, NO TO STAFFORD.... YOU WIN THROUGH THE DRAFT


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

probably would be better to remove Tom Brady entirely and then lay out your evidence discussing only recent history.  Not sure going back to the early 90s holds much weight.  Too much different back then.   

Brady is a football anomaly that skews and distorts so much.  

Not just the NFL, but we are entering a new era of professional sports.  Superstar athletes behave different and view things differently now.   So I would imagine things to some extent will skew more to what 2020 Tom Brady represents than the Patriot Brady you noted going forward.   In 1990, a QB wouldn't be doing what Watson is doing currently.   Could argue the Lions wouldn't be doing what they are doing now either as teams built themselves differently and developed QBs slower. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

probably would be better to remove Tom Brady entirely and then lay out your evidence discussing only recent history.  Not sure going back to the early 90s holds much weight.  Too much different back then.   

Brady is a football anomaly that skews and distorts so much.  

Not just the NFL, but we are entering a new era of professional sports.  Superstar athletes behave different and view things differently now.   So I would imagine things to some extent will skew more to what 2020 Tom Brady represents than the Patriot Brady you noted going forward.   In 1990, a QB wouldn't be doing what Watson is doing currently.   Could argue the Lions wouldn't be doing what they are doing now either as teams built themselves differently and developed QBs slower. 

one more thought to add to this...

another reason I think it will start to skew more to a 2020 Tom Brady is that because of rule changes and how long QBs can play because of it and other factors.    So Brady goes to Tampa.  Peyton goes to Denver.  Rivers goes to Indy.  I think more and more big names that would have retired with a team earlier years ago... play for other teams going forward. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

one more thought to add to this...

another reason I think it will start to skew more to a 2020 Tom Brady is that because of rule changes and how long QBs can play because of it and other factors.    So Brady goes to Tampa.  Peyton goes to Denver.  Rivers goes to Indy.  I think more and more big names that would have retired with a team earlier years ago... play for other teams going forward. 

 

Montana went to the Chiefs

Flacco went to the Broncos

Vick went to the Eagles

Cousins went to the Vikings

Favre went to the Vikings

Palmer went to the Raiders

Cam went to the Pats

Big name QBs have gone to other teams with limited to no success

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBigKat said:

Montana went to the Chiefs

Flacco went to the Broncos

Vick went to the Eagles

Cousins went to the Vikings

Favre went to the Vikings

Palmer went to the Raiders

Cam went to the Pats

Big name QBs have gone to other teams with limited to no success

But do you really think Watson would come home and not succeed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BrianS said:

If you want to lessen the Brady effect, just look at BOTH QB's in each SB.  Think of it like this:  If you get to the SB, there's a 50/50 chance you win it.  Those SB "losers" got their team there and gave them a chance.  That's all you can ask for.

2001- could have been Warner

2003- could have been Delhomme

2004- could have been McNabb (Drafted)

2005- could have been Russell (drafted)

2016- could have been Ryan (drafted)

2018- could have been Goff (drafted)

 

Even if "the other team" beat the Pats in their SB wins drafted QBs still outpaced FA/traded QBs

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Montana went to the Chiefs

Flacco went to the Broncos

Vick went to the Eagles

Cousins went to the Vikings

Favre went to the Vikings

Palmer went to the Raiders

Cam went to the Pats

Big name QBs have gone to other teams with limited to no success

as I said, league is changing.  You got to factor that in and it makes a comparisons to different eras irrelevant IMO.   QBs play longer.  Teams don't take as long to develop and play drafted guys.  That is going to create new scenarios that simply didn't exist in years past. 

Look at other sports, how many teams did Jordan, Bird, Magic, etc win titles with.   Superstars essentially got married to a city and build their legacy there.    Players don't care about that anymore.  Lebron gonna win titles with how many different teams? 

In the past, players went to other teams because franchises were ready to move on.  Going forward we are going to see superstar players dictating they are the ones ready to move on.   We are seeing that in numerous sports. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Montana went to the Chiefs

Flacco went to the Broncos

Vick went to the Eagles

Cousins went to the Vikings

Favre went to the Vikings

Palmer went to the Raiders

Cam went to the Pats

Big name QBs have gone to other teams with limited to no success

Cousins, Favre, Palmer, Vick all took other teams to the playoffs though.   And again, they all represent recent history.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like many of the old heads, I’ve been here for a long time.  I got a lot of respect for everyone on this board for your dedication to this team.  We’ve all been through it during the tougher years. At this point in life, I’m not one to judge anyone’s level of dedication, or their reasons why anymore.  Time, and a lot of bad football, will do that.  For me, it’s simple.  We share a common bond.  For that, I love and appreciate all of you crazy SOB’s. For me, last season was at a minimum, entertaining.  BY lead a young team to multiple come from behind 4th qtr wins.  That showed me heart, and that he has the clutch gene.  That’s the wildcard intangible.  For me, that was fun to watch even  if it was mindbogglingly frustrating at times.  Over the past two seasons, we have progressively built a better team around him.  On paper, the defense should be better this season.  That’ll help.  Let’s see what he can do as the other guys continue to develop too.  Besides, his contract is cheap for a few more years, and we just made some smart cap decisions during the draft. Let’s see how it shakes out. 
    • Hiring Shula & his Cam save us playbook.
    • I would very much liked to have seen Jake Delhomme's career if Tommy Jone no hurt Jake.  I just know that roster and the leadership were destined to hit paydirt but Jake was never the same after the elbow injury, and unfortunately he was the sole reason they didn't make it back to the big one.  I think that 08 team was the best in the league, and Jake masked his inability well all season til the Arizona game put it all on display.  I'll go back to the season prior even and say the 07 team was primed to be a competitor.  Jake was off to a fantastic start that year (for a Panthers QB).  They may have been a championship caliber club for a few seasons after 08 too.
×
×
  • Create New...