Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Panthers land Stafford, it is win now, not rebuild


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SpeedOFLight said:

I would definitely take Stafford and we would be competing for the division. Solid QB. We can draft a QB in later rounds. I don’t get why people always think that with are guaranteed to get a franchise QB in the top 10. 

Because odds are significantly better to draft one in round 1 than drafting a prospect in the later rounds.  Nobody said it's guaranteed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy will only hit us for $15M as a post-June 1st cut. Stafford would hit us for $20M. 

We save $8M releasing Teddy. We'll save another $14.5M making Short a post-June 1st cut. We'll save $6M releasing Weatherly. We can free up another $5M if need be by releasing Paradis. $4M releasing Burris. $2M is we're done with Ian Thomas. 

There's plenty of fat to trim.

Only $15m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heres another Lesson, remember the AEdmards trade? A future 2 for him, that 2 became the 33 pick. I believe he was the 89th pick. Like the texans this year, they traded a future 1s for Tunsil. If you win and go playoffing, its now in the 20s. Trading future picks, you better win and not pull a Herniay. 

Issue with that trade, its not Hernaiy worst future trade up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy will only hit us for $15M as a post-June 1st cut. Stafford would hit us for $20M. 

We save $8M releasing Teddy. We'll save another $14.5M making Short a post-June 1st cut. We'll save $6M releasing Weatherly. We can free up another $5M if need be by releasing Paradis. $4M releasing Burris. $2M is we're done with Ian Thomas. 

There's plenty of fat to trim.

I agree on all that fat that needs trimmed but don't lose sight of that fact that those guys will have to be replaced.  So factor that into the equation.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I agree on all that fat that needs trimmed but don't lose sight of that fact that those guys will have to be replaced.  So factor that into the equation.

If we add a legit QB, Teddy won't need to be replaced. We'd just stick with Walker or a similar cheap option.

Weatherly was terrible. His snap count was going down every week until he ended up on IR. He's already been replaced.

I think we're going to spend at least two picks on OL and 3 wouldn't shock me 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Because Marty convinced him to.  The great evaluator of talent we adamant that Teddy was the man

Its hard to believe Rhule is that much of a push over. Maybe he his or maybe he just isn't good at qb evaluation. He seems promising otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we add a legit QB, Teddy won't need to be replaced. We'd just stick with Walker or a similar cheap option.

Weatherly was terrible. His snap count was going down every week until he ended up on IR. He's already been replaced.

I think we're going to spend at least two picks on OL and 3 wouldn't shock me 

They are going to need more than that unfortunately.  But it's a good start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...