Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Todd McShay is CONVINCED we will move on from Teddy


JABANOG
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Basbear said:

Rich Gannon got better at a late stage, Kurt Warner did too. Odds are not in Teddys favor, AT ALL. Mainly Im hoping he gets better, cause Id dont see a smart move to move on this year. The team needed TDs, CMC had 6 TDs in three games. I feel lots of the teddy hate, needs to be on CMC. It was a short weird convid offseason and Joe Brady never install a offense before. Teddy was new to carolina too, many reasons for his lack of play. 

Gannon and Warner had better tools overall, and Gannon should have been starting in KC way before he went to Oakland.  He always looked very solid when playing but for some reason Schottenheimer, not exactly an offensive mastermind, felt the need to go with guys like Bono and Grbac. I think Gannon was  a bit ahead of the times in terms of his general athleticism at the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I'm not saying Brady wasn't at fault and I don't think that he's some sort of messiah, he screwed up a ton this year, but the players and coaches giving interviews use "coachspeak" for a reason.  Easy answer was "there were some issues towards the end of the game, but we all gotta be better in those situations so in the future we walk away with a win".  Simple, that's the coach speak answer, saying your coach wasn't getting the calls in on time is going out of your way to make that publicly known where as usually that is an internal matter.  just to reiterate, Its not that he's not right, he most likely is, but answers like that rub coaches the wrong way.

Fair assessment, but I don't think that's what he meant to do. I mean he always says the right thing. Is he the guy that's said 1,000 "right things" over the past 8 years, or the guy whose said the wrong thing a handful of times?

5 minutes ago, PandaMan said:

Plus, like... DJ was wide open in the end zone not even 10 yards away and he missed him completely.  I understand that since the call was late he might not have been sure of the route DJ was running without hesitating, but he was WIDE open.  A starting QB would’ve taken accountability for that and admitted that he fuged up.  “I have to make a better throw in that situation”

I'd have to go back, I do think he comments on that, but this was about the the time management issue, and not the play itself. He was directly asked and responded about the time management issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Gannon and Warner had better tools overall, and Gannon should have been starting in KC way before he went to Oakland.  He always looked very solid when playing but for some reason Schottenheimer, not exactly an offensive mastermind, felt the need to go with guys like Bono and Grbac. I think Gannon was  a bit ahead of the times in terms of his general athleticism at the position.

Fair assessment. Teddy's problem is he's closer to Chad Pennington, so even when he's playing his best his ceiling is lower because of his arm strength. And age catches up to guys like that faster. He can get it done with a good surrounding cast, but he can't carry you.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if we don't get Deshaun you can bet your bottom dollar there will be a LOT of talks between the Panthers and Jets/Dolphins. 

If the Dolphins don't get Deshaun I could see them doing a deal of 3 for 8 plus other stuff. They would likely still get the same player at 8 they wanted at 3 tbh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, joemac said:

Rich Gannon had Tim Brown and Jerry Rice to throw to. Kurt Warner had Marshall Faulk, Torrey Holt and Issac Bruce.

CMC, Roddy ANderson, DJ Moore are not chopped liver. A couple of them could be HOFers. So if Teddy stays(unlikely)- will he have less, more, or the same numbers/impact? His first year staring since 2015(?), Brady first time installing O, new to queen, lost CMC early, no TE, no OTAs, no training camp, no off-season group trips, played hurt after TB, convid BS, etc etc. People have been far too hard on him. I believe, given ALL that listed, he could improve some. Thats my hope too, since we're on the hook for part of his salary. People act like he was the worst QB in NFL history, he played average and got a average check. Its not a win or lost. He set career highs with all of that too. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

We love to blame Hurney for every bad move the Panthers make but for some reason we attach Teddy to Rhule and for the life of me I cant understand why. It was such a desperate move and only one person in a decision making role was desperate. 

I had always figured it was primarily Joe Brady who lobbied for Teddy. Was surprised when you told us who was really responsible.

It makes perfect sense though. We read well before things really got started that Marty believed the team could win now rather than having to rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I had always figured it was primarily Joe Brady who lobbied for Teddy. Was surprised when you told us who was really responsible.

It makes perfect sense though. We read well before things really got started that Marty believed the team could win now rather than having to rebuild.

from the man who brought us Jimmy Clausen.  The one true Hurney draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I would surmise that given how wrong that assessment turn out to be may have had something to do with the choice to hire Fitterer. 

Gotta throw the Greg Little disaster in there too.

Tepper gave some pretty clear indications last offseason that he didn't think Marty was doing a good job on the pro side. That's where all the talk about hiring an assistant GM with a pro personnel background came from.

That he still seemed to think Marty could be valuable as a drafter worried me, but I guess ultimately he just decided to move on completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

from the man who brought us Jimmy Clausen.  The one true Hurney draft. 

I was feeling a little masochistic so I went back and looked at that draft.

Round 2 - Jimmy Clausen
Round 3 - Brandon LaFell
Round 3b - Armanti Edwards 🙄
Round 4 - Eric Norwood (did he ever play a down?)
Round 6 - He Who Shall Not Be Named
Round 6b - David Gettis (the greatest receiver in Panther history)
Round 6c - Jordan Pugh
Round 6d - Tony Pike (because Clausen alone wasn't enough)
Round 7 - R.J. Stanford
Round 7b - Robert McClain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I had always figured it was primarily Joe Brady who lobbied for Teddy. Was surprised when you told us who was really responsible.

It makes perfect sense though. We read well before things really got started that Marty believed the team could win now rather than having to rebuild.

Marty had a 0% chance at a new contract if Will Grier was the QB. He wasn't going to survive a tanking season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I had always figured it was primarily Joe Brady who lobbied for Teddy. Was surprised when you told us who was really responsible.

It makes perfect sense though. We read well before things really got started that Marty believed the team could win now rather than having to rebuild.

I heard Jeff Nixon played a big role, Rhule said so in one of his pressers. I was surprised by RR too, hes in my circle of trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...