Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wentz update: Trade is close, with three teams involved

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, trueblade said:

They had a guy on CBS Sports Radio saying that part of the trade is Foles going back to Philly.

CHICAGO--GARRAPPOLO

COLTS -- WENTZ

NINERS--TRUBISKI

EAGLES--FOLES

Not sure how this plays out, but the result (if these are the teams) that makes the most sense in my mind.

DARK HORSE, MYSTERY PARTICIPANT:  Washington--If they did not want to be mentioned, it could suggest a division rival is involved.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Are these trades you are suggesting or just offseason moves in general?

Destinations-the QB that seems to match the team best in my mind--no science or rumor involved--I can't help but wonder if WASHINGTON is not the third, mystery team.  Maybe a division rival is why they need a triangulation of trade partners....Again conspiracy theory and blind speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

CHICAGO--GARRAPPOLO

COLTS -- WENTZ

NINERS--TRUBISKI

EAGLES--FOLES BACKING UP HURTS

Not sure how this plays out, but the result (if these are the teams) that makes the most sense in my mind.

DARK HORSE, MYSTERY PARTICIPANT:  Washington--If they did not want to be mentioned, it could suggest a division rival is involved.

It is said that the locker room loves and respects Hurts. That's big for a QB position to be seen as the leader. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Destinations-the QB that seems to match the team best in my mind--no science or rumor involved--I can't help but wonder if WASHINGTON is not the third, mystery team.  Maybe a division rival is why they need a triangulation of trade partners....Again conspiracy theory and blind speculation.

Okay, I was just going to point out that Trubisky is actually a free agent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

HOLY fug NUTS 10,000,000 roster bonus on day 3???? fug outta here, plus 15,000,000 base for 2021, 6mill option bonus too, kill me now. Why is this a story??

 

2019 Contract details by year 27 $720,000 $7,673,782 - - - $8,393,782 $70,870,934 $17,087,683($17,087,683)  
2020 Contract details by year 28 $1,383,000 $3,273,536 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 - $18,656,536 $77,877,152 $39,383,000($56,470,683)  
2021 Contract details by year 29 $15,400,000 $3,273,536 $10,000,000 $6,000,000 - $34,673,536 $59,220,614 $25,400,000($81,870,683)  

POTENTIAL OUT: 2022, 3 YR, $81,870,683; $24,547,076 DEAD CAP

2022 Contract details by year 30 $22,000,000 $3,273,536 $1,000 $6,000,000 - $31,274,536 $24,547,076 $22,001,000($103,871,683)  
2023 Contract details by year 31 $20,000,000 $3,273,539 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $36,273,539 $15,273,539 $27,000,000($130,871,683)  
2024 Contract details by year 32 $21,000,000 - $5,000,000 $6,000,000 - $32,000,000 $6,000,000

LOL at only 24 million in dead cap for 2022, listed as a "a out". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jared Patterson Mentor

Jared Patterson

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We can save $8M this coming season and $21M the next by making him a post-June 1st cut. Throwing good money after bad is never a good idea. That's what always got Hurney in trouble.

So if we cut him we gain 8 million this year? The way we have talked about him really seems like we don't even want him to groom a new QB. Do you think we cut him and how much would we gain for FA this offseason?

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OneBadCat
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By OneBadCat · Posted

      Cam was hitting his stride as a QB in 2017/2018.     This is why I think stats like completion percentage are overrated. As long as a QB is clutch and makes the throws to win the game the rest doesn’t really matter. What good is a check down stat padder if they’re a choker.  Until Norv Turner (and briefly Chud) got here we put Cam in high pressure throwing situations all the time. We also ran the ball on first down more than most teams in the NFL in the Ron era. Coupled with shitty WRs, all that is expressed in his stats. I also assume Cam took the ball in his hands on many occasions rather than trust Funchess to catch the ball.    It was also never Cams job to play the game like someone else. His presence on the field dictated the game in a way that is rarely seen.  He showed he could play the dink and dunk game just before TJ Watt. That didn’t suddenly make him better than his earlier seasons. He just got put in a legit under center  passing game again for first time since his rookie year with Chud.    Ron took the quickest path to success and abused the RPO because his ass was about to get fired.    Cam never got the credit for being the cerebral player that he was. I just think when you are legitimately a human Superman, sometimes the best play is having the ball in your hands. He was a better passer than Delhomme was. 
    • jfra78
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By jfra78 · Posted

      I don't think Canales has any problem benching Bryce or moving on if Bryce doesn't come out playing like the end of last year.  It's year 3 no more excuses for Bryce
    • Tr3ach
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      Yea Bryce was definitely a top half qb the second half of last season but I'm not sure Canales is 100% sold on him.  Like I've said in another post I think that's part of why we talked to so many South Carolina players in the draft process.  I think they are doing early due diligence on Sellers just in case.
×
×
  • Create New...