Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wentz update: Trade is close, with three teams involved

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, trueblade said:

They had a guy on CBS Sports Radio saying that part of the trade is Foles going back to Philly.

CHICAGO--GARRAPPOLO

COLTS -- WENTZ

NINERS--TRUBISKI

EAGLES--FOLES

Not sure how this plays out, but the result (if these are the teams) that makes the most sense in my mind.

DARK HORSE, MYSTERY PARTICIPANT:  Washington--If they did not want to be mentioned, it could suggest a division rival is involved.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Are these trades you are suggesting or just offseason moves in general?

Destinations-the QB that seems to match the team best in my mind--no science or rumor involved--I can't help but wonder if WASHINGTON is not the third, mystery team.  Maybe a division rival is why they need a triangulation of trade partners....Again conspiracy theory and blind speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

CHICAGO--GARRAPPOLO

COLTS -- WENTZ

NINERS--TRUBISKI

EAGLES--FOLES BACKING UP HURTS

Not sure how this plays out, but the result (if these are the teams) that makes the most sense in my mind.

DARK HORSE, MYSTERY PARTICIPANT:  Washington--If they did not want to be mentioned, it could suggest a division rival is involved.

It is said that the locker room loves and respects Hurts. That's big for a QB position to be seen as the leader. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Destinations-the QB that seems to match the team best in my mind--no science or rumor involved--I can't help but wonder if WASHINGTON is not the third, mystery team.  Maybe a division rival is why they need a triangulation of trade partners....Again conspiracy theory and blind speculation.

Okay, I was just going to point out that Trubisky is actually a free agent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

HOLY fug NUTS 10,000,000 roster bonus on day 3???? fug outta here, plus 15,000,000 base for 2021, 6mill option bonus too, kill me now. Why is this a story??

 

2019 Contract details by year 27 $720,000 $7,673,782 - - - $8,393,782 $70,870,934 $17,087,683($17,087,683)  
2020 Contract details by year 28 $1,383,000 $3,273,536 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 - $18,656,536 $77,877,152 $39,383,000($56,470,683)  
2021 Contract details by year 29 $15,400,000 $3,273,536 $10,000,000 $6,000,000 - $34,673,536 $59,220,614 $25,400,000($81,870,683)  

POTENTIAL OUT: 2022, 3 YR, $81,870,683; $24,547,076 DEAD CAP

2022 Contract details by year 30 $22,000,000 $3,273,536 $1,000 $6,000,000 - $31,274,536 $24,547,076 $22,001,000($103,871,683)  
2023 Contract details by year 31 $20,000,000 $3,273,539 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $36,273,539 $15,273,539 $27,000,000($130,871,683)  
2024 Contract details by year 32 $21,000,000 - $5,000,000 $6,000,000 - $32,000,000 $6,000,000

LOL at only 24 million in dead cap for 2022, listed as a "a out". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jared Patterson Mentor

Jared Patterson

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We can save $8M this coming season and $21M the next by making him a post-June 1st cut. Throwing good money after bad is never a good idea. That's what always got Hurney in trouble.

So if we cut him we gain 8 million this year? The way we have talked about him really seems like we don't even want him to groom a new QB. Do you think we cut him and how much would we gain for FA this offseason?

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Bryce = Alex Smith

      By strato · Posted

      Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • strato
      Should Canalas bring someone else in to call offensive plays?

      By strato · Posted

      We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Jay Roosevelt
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      Hoping Sonny Styles falls to us.
×
×
  • Create New...