Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wentz update: Trade is close, with three teams involved


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, trueblade said:

They had a guy on CBS Sports Radio saying that part of the trade is Foles going back to Philly.

CHICAGO--GARRAPPOLO

COLTS -- WENTZ

NINERS--TRUBISKI

EAGLES--FOLES

Not sure how this plays out, but the result (if these are the teams) that makes the most sense in my mind.

DARK HORSE, MYSTERY PARTICIPANT:  Washington--If they did not want to be mentioned, it could suggest a division rival is involved.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Are these trades you are suggesting or just offseason moves in general?

Destinations-the QB that seems to match the team best in my mind--no science or rumor involved--I can't help but wonder if WASHINGTON is not the third, mystery team.  Maybe a division rival is why they need a triangulation of trade partners....Again conspiracy theory and blind speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

CHICAGO--GARRAPPOLO

COLTS -- WENTZ

NINERS--TRUBISKI

EAGLES--FOLES BACKING UP HURTS

Not sure how this plays out, but the result (if these are the teams) that makes the most sense in my mind.

DARK HORSE, MYSTERY PARTICIPANT:  Washington--If they did not want to be mentioned, it could suggest a division rival is involved.

It is said that the locker room loves and respects Hurts. That's big for a QB position to be seen as the leader. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Destinations-the QB that seems to match the team best in my mind--no science or rumor involved--I can't help but wonder if WASHINGTON is not the third, mystery team.  Maybe a division rival is why they need a triangulation of trade partners....Again conspiracy theory and blind speculation.

Okay, I was just going to point out that Trubisky is actually a free agent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HOLY fug NUTS 10,000,000 roster bonus on day 3???? fug outta here, plus 15,000,000 base for 2021, 6mill option bonus too, kill me now. Why is this a story??

 

2019 Contract details by year 27 $720,000 $7,673,782 - - - $8,393,782 $70,870,934 $17,087,683($17,087,683)  
2020 Contract details by year 28 $1,383,000 $3,273,536 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 - $18,656,536 $77,877,152 $39,383,000($56,470,683)  
2021 Contract details by year 29 $15,400,000 $3,273,536 $10,000,000 $6,000,000 - $34,673,536 $59,220,614 $25,400,000($81,870,683)  

POTENTIAL OUT: 2022, 3 YR, $81,870,683; $24,547,076 DEAD CAP

2022 Contract details by year 30 $22,000,000 $3,273,536 $1,000 $6,000,000 - $31,274,536 $24,547,076 $22,001,000($103,871,683)  
2023 Contract details by year 31 $20,000,000 $3,273,539 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $36,273,539 $15,273,539 $27,000,000($130,871,683)  
2024 Contract details by year 32 $21,000,000 - $5,000,000 $6,000,000 - $32,000,000 $6,000,000

LOL at only 24 million in dead cap for 2022, listed as a "a out". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We can save $8M this coming season and $21M the next by making him a post-June 1st cut. Throwing good money after bad is never a good idea. That's what always got Hurney in trouble.

So if we cut him we gain 8 million this year? The way we have talked about him really seems like we don't even want him to groom a new QB. Do you think we cut him and how much would we gain for FA this offseason?

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...