Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Voth on the QB situation...


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Ok now I can't stop:
Gated Brewed Dirty
Gyrated Bird Tweed (roflmao)
Tragedy Birded Wet (hahah)
Raged Biddy Wetter (omg)
Graded Bitter Dewy
Daddy Brig Tweeter 

Dab Dredger Ye Twit
Debated Grid We Try
Badder Ed We Gritty (pahaha)

Grab Redyed Dew Tit (don't tho)
Bar Deed Ditty Grew

lol omg I have too much fun with this poo man

I am in your head!!!!  Grab Redyed Dew Tit.   If I had a nickel....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Ok now I can't stop:
Gated Brewed Dirty
Gyrated Bird Tweed (roflmao)
Tragedy Birded Wet (hahah)
Raged Biddy Wetter (omg)
Graded Bitter Dewy
Daddy Brig Tweeter 

Dab Dredger Ye Twit
Debated Grid We Try
Badder Ed We Gritty (pahaha)

Grab Redyed Dew Tit (don't tho)
Bar Deed Ditty Grew

lol omg I have too much fun with this poo man

You okay? 🤔

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wouldn't mind that, and we'd be doing so with a better talent evaluator running the process.

This free agency period--with the reduced cap and elite names wanting fair market value--should leave quite a few talented players lying around on week 2.  I think we could find a few OL that way--maybe a DT--maybe even a LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Waldo said:

. In on every deal is something an idiot says.

That kinda bothered me too.  Not sure it was meant literally--but who knows?  We know they went after Stafford hard, no signs we went after Wentz (unless I missed a memo).  No rumblings about the possibility of Minshew, etc.I really do not know what that meant.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me if this sounds logical:

In all probability, we are staying with TB unless we trade away multiple first rounders and maybe a player or two.

I do not see sitting at #8 a plan to bring in a QB.  This is one of those years, when QBs are on the move--like musical chairs--and if you are not aggressive, you are standing alone when the music stops. 

vintage summer GIF by Jessica Lea Mayfield

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

That kinda bothered me too.  Not sure it was meant literally--but who knows?  We know they went after Stafford hard, no signs we went after Wentz (unless I missed a memo).  No rumblings about the possibility of Minshew, etc.I really do not know what that meant.

There are plenty of deals to not be in on. Like Wentz fixes anything at QB for us regardless of price? Just not a trust building statement.

We will see but I am uneasy with this current situation. I think the next 3 months will prove plenty, just not sure I am going to like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

There are plenty of deals to not be in on. Like Wentz fixes anything at QB for us regardless of price? Just not a trust building statement.

We will see but I am uneasy with this current situation. I think the next 3 months will prove plenty, just not sure I am going to like it.

I don't mind being in on every deal. "In on every deal" doesn't necessarily mean actively competing in every deal. "In" could simply mean reaching out to check the temperature. It never hurts to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bigskypanthersguy said:

The point being, there is no short term viable option to fix the oline and I would prefer we have all our picks to accomplish that.

Frankly if Watson happens we would be better off with FA to fill that hole.

And all that cap space?

We do have other people to retain too and Watson's deal is an albatross.

And there is still no indication Houston wants to trade him.

And Moton getting extended may not happen.

People act like our O-Line was the worst line in the NFL last year or something.  I seem to remember a 3 or 4 game stretch last year where we did not give up one single sack.  We will have one anchor with Moton at T, there are options to be had out there to bolster the rest of it.  Personally, I don't think the OL situation is as bad as some around here make it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bigskypanthersguy said:

We still seem to struggle with drafting oline.

Our new GM came from Seattle who struggles there too.

A lithe QB with an injury history with an experimental approach at best to an oline is not a recipe for success.

We are not even certain we can keep Moton and Paradis would be our next "best" olineman which says little.

You Watson proponents seem to think he is the only key piece we need.

Like it or not we are years away from being consistently competitive so frankly why the frenzy now when something else may open up down the road that is less expensive?

I know Watson is tantalizing.

But after giving up multiple picks and possibly defensive starters, how long does it take to replenish a cupboard that is sparse to begin with?

LOL we are not "years away" from being competitive.  We lost 7 or 8 one score games last season.  We were in nearly every single game to the very end.  Our main problem last year was a pansy, scared QB who was afraid to push the ball down the field at all times.  We replace Teddy with Deshaun last year, with the same team, and we probably win 10 games at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, I'm not so sure I'm opposed to trading for GM, and just outright cutting Teddy.  Really don't want to mortgage the future on a player in this draft not named Trevor.

Don't want Teddy starting again and us eeking out 7 wins while pissing off the fans even further.

Shame.  Shame.  Shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
    • 100% agree, trading him would be the best possible scenario. It allows for a clean start at QB and you get something back.
×
×
  • Create New...