Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So now there's this...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He had 83 INTs and 44 fumbles in 86 games. Everyone always just looked the other way on his turnover issues.

That’s a fair point. The narrative around him was crazy. I’m biased being a Clemson guy. Him and DW are two of the best QBs I’ve seen in college 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Oh fug I haven't been keeping up honestly welp....I thought they still had the old regime which drafted well honestly. Oh well

Yeah, they fired Caldwell. Trent Baalke is the GM now, though I'm pretty sure Urban Meyer is the guy who's really in charge.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

You know exactly what I mean.

I don't know you.

When someone says Tepper is going out of his way to get two people from SC that's what they mean. If you meant "Tepper is going out of his way to get two people who went to school at Clemson" then say that poo. Makes much more sense the second way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Still on the fence.  Thought so.

 

C'mon man, it's pretty clear what he's saying...

He thinks Lawrence is better than Wilson right now, but he thinks Wilson has more of a boom or bust potential than Lawrence, does someone take that risk over the safe thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Believe it or not, these things aren't black or white.  NFL teams absolutely consider floors.

I think it's a generation thing. Before the kids I never heard someone say "make a call" when simply discussion football ROFL. How fugin funny is that poo. It's like you can tell how old certain people are(both ways) by some of this poo.

On the fence wtf does that even mean in this context lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

So make a call...get off the fence.  You are calling that Zach Wilson is better than Trevor Lawrence?  Right?  If not stop trying to look clever.  Lawrence is better period.

He's saying that if Wilson reaches his max potential he'll be better than T Law. I disagree but thats what hes saying

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real question is what exactly would it cost to trade up. Last time teams traded up for QB at 1 and 2 was 2016. Using those as a baseline Id probably prefer this route, hell, might be cheaper.

In 2016:

Rams moved up from number 15 to number 1.

Rams gave up 2016: 1st, two 2nds, 3rd, 2017: 1st, 3rd. They received the Titans 2016: 1st (Number one overall) 4th and 6th. 

 

Eagles moved up from eight to number 2 for another QB. 

Eagles gave up 2016: 1st, 3rd, 4th, 2017: 1st, 2018: 2nd. They received the Browns 1st (2 overall) and 2017 4th.

 

I would do both of those in a heartbeat, neither are nearly as expensive in comparison to the rumors around Watson.

Edited by SteveSmithTD89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Believe it or not, these things aren't black or white.  NFL teams absolutely consider floors.

Trevor Lawrence has the better floor, ceiling, basement and yard than Wilson.  Talk to me about Wilson vs Fields who I think he also loses the argument to as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So what about their sign is not compliant or causing the issue according to the rules? Them always having it, or the amount of time they have had it, or their loyalty to the team is not relevant to this situation. To be clear, I know next to nothing about this situation, just trying to clarify.  I have no dog in this fight and am emotionless on this topic. If you are breaking a rule, you do not get special treatment just because you have been here breaking it a long time.
    • The team fell for that late season averageness he displayed last year and got burned. You want to do that again? I don’t.  But I sort of do agree that we are stuck with him as the starter.  I can’t decide whether replacing him gets us into the playoffs so suffering through one last season is the price for freedom in 2026.  Three ways to be free in 2026: He actually plays like a real NFL QB,  The team sends him packing. Be completely out on tne Panthers until changes are made. 
    • Short version = these people have had those seats since the beginning and haven't missed a game. They have always had their sign. They had to change the sign - I think in 2015 when Cam ripped that Packers fan's banner down (love him for that, by the way) - to be compliant and haven't had any issues in the last 10 years. The Panthers even used a photo of them and their sign in their album from the Falcons game. In the 3rd quarter last weekend it was decided that the sign needed to come down. Seems weird and unnecessary, especially since it has been there for every game for a decade.   EDIT: they've had it since 2003. Still a long-ass time.... Also "cringe" is a funny word for someone over the age of 18 who lives and overshares on the Huddle. But, ok....
×
×
  • Create New...