Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A new fire to the Watson drama (per Jason la Canfora)


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

Exactly. And we have folks getting mad about the Panthers getting involved in this madness. To me, it’s been the most exciting off season I can remember. But alas, can’t please some folks. 

Hell yeah!  At least we have something fun to talk about!  I can only read so many write ups on the strengths and weaknesses of the first round QBs.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Bow chic a bow woww

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love to be able to talk about something that could be very exciting here. Number of threads don't matter. If you are tired of them don't open them. This is a lot better than most seasons when we talk about. We have no cash. We will have to look at the bottom of the bin on free agents. This to me is exciting off season to talk about. We may not have another one for a while. Enjoy it!

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Lol..Relax. Easterby shouldn’t have the job he has, but that doesn’t make his poor choices contagious.
 

Besides, Cal is responsible for Easterby. Easterby is just doing what he can with his extremely limited skill set and perspective.

I’m sure we’re all friends with lots of people who would make terrible football execs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Without reading through the thread, isn't Drummond in our PR department?  Meaning he has no influence on personnel?

Drummond just got promoted to prevent Houston from hiring him as their team president. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah...Don't necessarily think this means anything with regard to Watson.

Can however say I'm not real happy about anybody in our organization having a friendship with Jack Easterby though, especially somebody high up.

(Easterby should be avoided like the plague)

Hey it’s Debbie Downer post #1000.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No it's not, there isn't a single coach who's only job is to win games, because no coach is going to win games unless they're also improving the quality of play out of their players. For coaches with contending teams, winning is their #1 job, but I think it's a more than reasonable take to say that coaches of not yet contending teams winning comes second to making your players better. We have 11 games left, if you gave me the option of winning all 11 of the games in terribly ugly fashion to where we don't improve the quality of our players vs we lose all 11 games, but do so in spectacular fashion where our players show significant improvement, I'm taking option B every time. Because option B is the path to future and long term success, while option A is a path to short term happiness at the expense of long term franchise stability.   And yes, that is clearly an extreme example that could never actually play out in either way, but you still know what I mean.  And no, it has nothing to do with draft position, it's about how good will these players be a year, 2 years, 3 years, etc, down the line, when you hope to be a true contending team, because nobody actually thinks we're that type of team this year unless you're literally crazy
    • Yeah if that's what we're signing up for here, then I just can't get behind it.  That contract extension that Hurney gave Jake that offseason was BRUTAL.
    • That's quite literally his only job. Every year has new goals, new identities, etc. But the one constant is to win at all costs. He isn't guaranteed to be here next year UNLESS he wins. Why would he give a poo to mold a bunch of players someone else might be coaching? 
×
×
  • Create New...