Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A new fire to the Watson drama (per Jason la Canfora)


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:
4 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:
7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Who are you referencing at the end of your sentence?  The Jets?

Who does Fitterer report too?

"...too..."

???

To answer your question, he reports to Mr. David A. Tepper...

...as does Rhule.

The org chart* is as follows:

                              [TEPPER]

                   [RHULE  <  >  FITTERER]

                        [EVERYONE ELSE]

 

(*Appaloosa Model)

  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

I made a few more calls this past week regarding Watson. People I trust continue to doubt the likelihood of a trade. They can’t see a 25-year-old quarterback in the prime of his career dealt to another team. 

https://theathletic.com/2428506/2021/03/05/jets-mailbag-the-case-for-zach-wilson-not-deshaun-watson-as-the-next-qb/?source=emp_shared_article

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The Texans may be the one organization stupid enough to try this. Get a King’s ransom for a player that doesn’t want to play for you anyways, or keep him against his will and watch him refuse to play. 

Edited by MikeD83
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point the Panthers really should be focusing on Fields and Lance and doing their homework and where we need to trade up to. 

It think Fields you have to get up to three. Lance might last till 5 depending on how ATL views him. Doubt he lasts till 8 but it's possible. 

Would be very happy with either personally. I think both are potential Pro Bowlers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MikeD83 said:

The Texans may be the one organization stupid enough to try this. Get a King’s ransom for a player that doesn’t want to play for you anyways, or keep him against his will and watch him refuse to play. 

The Texans might want to play hardball but they also know that the time is NOW to trade him.  If they get into a pissing contest and Watson refuses to play his stock will go down  Houston needs to deal him because if they wait and play hardball it will backfire.  Teams will offer less than now because Houston will soon realize they are losing draft capital everyday they wait.  Teams will start to low ball them and force Houston to accept it before it gets worse. 

IMO they'll deal Watson before the draft.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The Texans might want to play hardball but they also know that the time is NOW to trade him. 

If they get into a pissing contest and Watson refuses to play his stock will go down 

I've seen nothing to indicate the Texans are motivated to do anything "NOW"...what are you basing this opinion on?

Why would Watson's "stock" go down?  What's the logic?

I figure even if he sits an entire year his trade value will be just as high if not higher this same time next year.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I've seen nothing to indicate the Texans are motivated to do anything "NOW"...what are you basing this opinion on?

Why would Watson's "stock" go down?  What's the logic?

I figure even if he sits an entire year his trade value will be just as high if not higher this same time next year.

bc you know where the draft pick lies with the team that you trade with now. For instance, post draft... the dolphins are not going to have 2 1st round picks and Tua to offer. They are going to go into the season with Tua and two new players they got out of the first round.

Whatever team they trade with post draft is going to be a crapshoot on where they land in the draft.  At least right now, they can pick where Watson goes, and know what kind of pick value they get in return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

bc you know where the draft pick lies with the team that you trade with now. For instance, post draft... the dolphins are not going to have 2 1st round picks and Tua to offer. They are going to go into the season with Tua and two new players they got out of the first round.

Whatever team they trade with post draft is going to be a crapshoot on where they land in the draft.  At least right now, they can pick where Watson goes, and know what kind of pick value they get in return. 

Gotcha, good logic.

That said, this time next year the conditions will be the same as now except other teams will know what they offered in 2021 didn't get the Texans to move on from DW and will likely have to offer more if they are truly interested.

If the Texans don't trade before the draft it would seem to be a pretty clear signal they intend to go to the mat in this situation and see it through...either DW shows up and plays or this show gets repeated in 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Gotcha, good logic.

That said, this time next year the conditions will be the same as now except other teams will know what they offered in 2021 didn't get the Texans to move on from DW and will likely have to offer more if they are truly interested.

If the Texans don't trade before the draft it would seem to be a pretty clear signal they intend to go to the mat in this situation and see it through...either DW shows up and plays or this show gets repeated in 2022.

It would be interesting to see if it goes that far. I think Watson will still be an sought after talent in a trade, but a 27 y/o QB who hasnt played in a whole year.... wont get as much traction as a 26 y/o QB coming off a top 3 season .... Teams will use that against the Texans. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I've seen nothing to indicate the Texans are motivated to do anything "NOW"...what are you basing this opinion on?

Why would Watson's "stock" go down?  What's the logic?

I figure even if he sits an entire year his trade value will be just as high if not higher this same time next year.

What hes actually worth, and what teams will offer the Texans are not always the same thing.  These GMs are ruthless, and if they know they have you by the balls, they will do whatever they can to make it worse.  Anybody who trades for Watson is going to try to do it for the least amount of capital as possible, likewise, Houston will try to completely maximize any return they get for him.  Waiting till after the draft, or into the season, is not a good play for them.  Thats when they get desperate, and you can smell desperation a mile away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, joemac said:

 Waiting till after the draft, or into the season, is not a good play for them.  Thats when they get desperate, and you can smell desperation a mile away.

That won't happen. 

If the player isn't traded by the conclusion of round-1 of the draft he will either play for the Texans, or sit out the year.  

51-days to go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

It would be interesting to see if it goes that far. I think Watson will still be an sought after talent in a trade, but a 27 y/o QB who hasnt played in a whole year.... wont get as much traction as a 26 y/o QB coming off a top 3 season .... Teams will use that against the Texans. 

I don't think sitting out a year will hurt his value one bit...stay level or increases. JMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...