Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: 49ers called Panthers about Teddy Bridgewater


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Playoff teams stop someone every once in a while.

so ball control isnt everything then, right? I mean you did just say that ball control was everything.... but it appears winning teams dont give a poo about ball control. Score Fast, Win Fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

so ball control isnt everything then, right? I mean you did just say that ball control was everything.... but it appears winning teams dont give a poo about ball control. Score Fast, Win Fast.

I said that the Panthers ran a ball control offense on order to protect the panther's defense. However with a defense as generous as yours, it didn't work so well. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Teddy looked exactly how he's always looked, and the stats and outcomes show it. The wheels fell off the offense when defenses got a bit of film and started sitting on everything under 20 yards with no threat of a deep game. It's no coincidence.

Ball control offense may keep teams hanging around in games but it doesn't win championships but once in a blue moon when it's paired with an all-decade defense. I live in KC and saw the Alex Smith years firsthand - it's also no coincidence that they didn't get anywhere in the playoffs until Mahomes took over.

Rhule and Brady knew who Teddy was. He didn't come here disguised as Mahomes.  Furthermore, why do you think that quarterbacks like Mahomes or Watson will cure what ails the Panthers.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Breakpoint4510 said:

Rhule and Brady knew who Teddy was. He didn't come here disguised as Mahomes.  Furthermore, why do you think that quarterbacks like Mahomes or Watson will cure what ails the Panthers.

A new quarterback alone won't make the Panthers a contender.

Neither will keeping Bridgewater.

But regarding the two options, the first at least makes the team better.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I'm just glad you got cut Tre...

Dude you have no life.. You follow every post I make for 6 months because I said..

"Tre while being below avg. Player and tackler didn't run from contact"

You have a complete aneurism and live your life thru a MB waiting for me in other topics.. Other then being a complete snowflake loser what do you have going on in your life??

Seriously is Tre fuging your mom and making you go to bed early??

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

As serious as you are when you blame Teddy for the Panther's problems.

Hey how is ur math Teddy when it’s 4 and 9 how many yds you need for a first down. Let me answer that for you 2 yds. Gimme a break we are so done with that poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

That's your problem right there. Teddy makes the Panthers look credible on offense in spite of a defense that's atrocious on third down, and you blame him. No appreciation what so ever. Where's Rhule, Brady and Snow's culpability. They have no role in the Panther's 5-11 season? Why is it all on Teddy Bridgewater?

No that's your problem.. Any QB putting up those numbers after being in the league for more then 5 years is consider not good by everybody not on crack.  Men lie women lie numbers don't.  ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

I said that the Panthers ran a ball control offense on order to protect the panther's defense. However with a defense as generous as yours, it didn't work so well. 

So not only do we need a great oline and more weapons we need a great  defense .. For Teddy to do better then 15tds and 11ints.. 

Had that in Minnesota and still didn't produce those numbers thoe??

Hmmmmmm

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Yet again, please show where anyone is *solely* placing blame on Teddy. You're in a thread about teddy - of course the conversation centers on his performance/lack thereof. Teddy's offense had chances to win games week in and week out regardless of what the other phases were doing and couldn't do it. It's self-contained empirical shortcoming.

Better then this... Let him Show us a team that had a QB throw 15tds and 11ints and went 0-8 in game winning situation and didn't want another QB???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, Breakpoint4510 said:

Rhule and Brady knew who Teddy was. He didn't come here disguised as Mahomes.  Furthermore, why do you think that quarterbacks like Mahomes or Watson will cure what ails the Panthers.

He sure didn't but I think Mahomes and the Chiefs coming back from double-digit deficits in every 2019 playoff game and Super Bowl pretty much proves the point. It takes a team of course but only the offense is responsible for scoring points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your problem is that someone told you about that 0-8, and you think it's a bible verse. What makes you think that any other quarterback will have the Panthers in those competitive situations. Some of you are willing to pay a kings ransom in an attempt to upgrade the quarterback position. If Teddy was so bad, why would it take so much to get better than him? 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...