Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!


Dan Snyder...what should they do with him

Recommended Posts

He absolutely should get forced out, no way he wasn't going to be connected somehow to the poopshow that has happened there. Slimy fugger. 

I'm also happy to watch him continue to lay turds left and right. I hate WTF and he guarantees they will suck forever.

Edited by Waldo
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

That was a mistake. I can't believe he did that.


11 hours ago, Scott12345 said:

still cant believe the skins changed their name

If y’all are going to call me out for race baiting then y’all can’t let this racist poo slide. 


  • Poo 1
Link to post
Share on other sites




Washington Owner Daniel Snyder Suspected of Using Bots to Improve Case Amid NFL Investigation

The Richmond Times-Dispatch points out that a number of Twitter accounts, all of which were created in October 2020, have been praising Synder and the Washington Football Team for their strides in diversity and progress after a Washington Post report where several former team employees came forward with sexual harassment allegations during their time working for the organization.

It appears these Twitter bots, which aren’t real people, consisted entirely of women, and their tweets were either focused on mentioning a specific talking point, or just lazily repeating the same exact message, word for word.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • BELIEVE!!!



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would it have to be either/or? If Pitts and either Sewell or Slater were there at #8, everybody here is voicing opinions as to why one is better than the other. Why not have our cake, and then go ahead and eat it, too. Take Pitts at #8, then trade our 2nd round pick, plus our #1 in 2022, to Denver, and get the OT we need with their #9.  (If you experts in swap values think that's not enough, add to it until it is.) Balls to the wall, boys.  If you all think Sewell/Slater are #1 picks this year (and they are), then they're equally worth next year's #1.
    • Well, that was kind of dumb since the scenarios are completely different. You don't need a mediocre vet to mentor another vet. Likely means probably, odds on or possibly. Since you didn't link the article, likely because it makes no sense after the Darnold threa, I have to make an assumption which is very plausible since there was a ton of discussion about us drafting a QB at 8 or trading up until SF made their trade. Time to read. I said worst case was that we would only save $8M by releasing him. $18M new cap hit minus $10M guaranteed that we'd have to pay on release equals $8M. Again, worst case is we only save $8M by releasing him and having to pay the guarantee. Way more than a zero chance of the last scenario. If we can trade Teddy, that scenario happens, period, simple as that. Amazing that you think there is no chance that Teddy gets release or traded after we made a trade for Darnold and committed to paying him in 2022.
  • Create New...