Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance on nfl network as if 12pm est


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Shocker said:

Who is going before the QBs?  This draft is really weak overall.

Are you saying a WR goes before the QBs?  Sewell a guy that didn’t play last season?  A TE/WR player?  

These QBs will go, it is happening 

I will bet you any amount of money that qbs don’t go 1-4.  Say $200.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Who is going before the QBs?  This draft is really weak overall.

Are you saying a WR goes before the QBs?  Sewell a guy that didn’t play last season?  A TE/WR player?  

These QBs will go, it is happening 

Sewell will go before QB4. Pitts and Chase might as well. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

Stop...we are on a forum here.  I will give you 20 pies but you wont pay me if I win either.  LOL

Spoiler alert:   You won’t win.   
 

it’s such a stupid fallacy it’s not even worth debating.   No draft will ever have 4 qbs going 1-4.  Especially this one where the next tier all have major question marks.  It’s stupid to even discuss as a possibility.  But if you want to Venmo a mod $200 I will do the same and see what happens 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Sewell will go before QB4. Pitts and Chase might as well. 

I don't see it but anything is possible.  Sewell is being massively overrated on this board.  He is not flawless by any means.  Pitts and Chase are good players.  QBs trump that sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Just watched the footage he's got a live arm for sure... but he's in shorts against an air defense and overshooting/missing quite a bit he's gonna take a couple of seasons if he booms. In a normal year he'd be a second round prospect.

How would he be a 2nd rounder in a normal year? What does this year have to do with his draft value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I get what your saying here but really the level of competition between Bama and NDS is like the Buccaneers playing a might might team.

I mean Alabama was way better that other teams this year. They are loaded with NFL talent. Mac Jones had a NFL line, RB, and WRs mostly 1st rounders going against a lot of players that won’t get drafted. The gap from Alabama to the average team they played could be greater than NDSU and their competition. Also Lance started the same number of games as Jones. So experience should be similar...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

How would he be a 2nd rounder in a normal year? What does this year have to do with his draft value?

The obvious reaching/overpayment for QBs, I suppose I should have said the last 2-3 teams a lot of teams are reaching and overpaying for QBs in both the draft and FA. He's about what I expected high talent level low refinement of said talents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looked incredibly smooth, comfortable, and in control. Love the intelligence of putting throws in there that QB-needy teams frequent in their playbooks.

I've been getting higher and higher on Lance, and after his pro day I'm completely okay with waiting for him to slide to #8. 

For those that have been worried that the top 4 QBs will be off of the board by #8: that has never happened before in the history of the modern draft. The closest it has come to that was in 1999 when the first 3 selections were QBs (Tim Couch, Donovan McNabb, Akali Smith) before the next two QBs went at #11 & #12 (Dante Culpepper & Cade McNown). 2011 was also close when Cam went at #1, Locker #8, Gabbert #10, and Ponder at #12 (Dalton & Kaepernick went back-to-back early in the 2nd round). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

It does matter who they played against. Lesser athletes against you give you far more wiggle room for mistakes. When Lance doesn’t know what to do he takes off. Great decision making against lesser athletes. Does that translate well to long term success in the pros? 

All I can say is you'll see. Lance isn't some dumb schmoe! You seem like you think that he doesn't know what he's doing back there, but I believe that he does. He is always cool and under control. 

Just like he played against "lesser athletes", he played with "lesser athletes" as well.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I mean Alabama was way better that other teams this year. They are loaded with NFL talent. Mac Jones had a NFL line, RB, and WRs mostly 1st rounders going against a lot of players that won’t get drafted. The gap from Alabama to the average team they played could be greater than NDSU and their competition. Also Lance started the same number of games as Jones. So experience should be similar...

For the record I don’t want anything to do with Mac Jones unless it's the fourth round, But this is hilarious.... The SEC is another planet from the subdivision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...