Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance - best QB of this draft not named Lawrence


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, joemac said:

I remember them making a huge deal out of the fact that he wore him helmet lol.

I forgot that part, but remember Teddy ones where he didnt use gloves and poo the bed..

 

Teddy should have learned what I did, "no glove no love"!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My preference of the non-Lawrence QBs is Wilson but it won't shock me if any out of Wilson, Fields, and Lance proves to be the best of the class. There's a lot to like about all three but legit reasons for concern too.

No risk it, no biscuit. If we want a safe pick, then we can just stick with Teddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

As long as you don't move up I would agree.  It would be hard to swallow a stale brick biscuit that you spent your rent money on.

That I can agree on, unless your confidence level from a scouting and evaluation perspective is extremely high

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAS said:

That I can agree on, unless your confidence level from a scouting and evaluation perspective is extremely high

Resist the temptation to over think it.  Sit tight and see how the cards fall.  Play the hand your dealt.  You get the idea.  There will be a really good player at 8.  We can use more of those everywhere except RB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Resist the temptation to over think it.  Sit tight and see how the cards fall.  Play the hand your dealt.  You get the idea.  There will be a really good player at 8.  We can use more of those everywhere except RB. 

IDK, if your evaluation  says Lance is a high probability to be a franchise QB, then you don’t miss that opportunity. Of course you can’t mortgage too much but hoping to land someone next year or in FA is prescription for years of mediocrity

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What I'm saying is I'm fine with drafting any of the three of them. 

That’s where I’m at. I can pick apart all three all day long or talk them up. Now is the time to be ultra critical though before we invest draft value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Their use of the phrase questionable QB situation fits perfectly. He is stuck, for the moment at least, in a situation with Bryce that he can't really get out of. There have been improvements for Young, but he hasn't been a world changer. He had horrible coaching first year and was saddled with a broken down remnant of what had been an afterthought team anyway. There's one year left to keep him on the cheap with the idea that if he cranks out a great season, we've got first dibs on him for the next. If he tanks out, then off to free agency Young goes to either a QB whisperer-type situation or becomes a fairly battle tested back up QB. And we get something to add into our compensatory picks formulation. This is a make or break year for Young, but not for Morgan or Canales. 
    • If they lose the ECF in wimpy fashion, like anything less than a Game 7, its time to can Rod. 
    • Do you people really give no credence to the fact that Carolina’s went almost two weeks between games while Montreal played an intense seven game series that just ended Monday? That break was too much to be ready to go, and it showed.   The Canes pressed in the first, likely from overzealousness to prove the layoff wasn’t too much. once the Canes settled into their game without pressing, the game was much tighter. Every year, posts in the Panthers forum question how little the starters play in the preseason? Why is that? Because we all know not going at game speed against an opponent can lead to a slow start when the games turn real. Even with prior ECF disappointments, I’m going to hope last night was more akin to starters not playing in the preseason. 
×
×
  • Create New...