Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Falcons restructure Matt Ryan's contract


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The Lions could potentially draft a QB, but I don't know that I'd call them QB hungry.

There are others though...

Yeah, if we don't have QB by draft time we will almost certainly move up.  Thats 3 of the 4....then people get desperate looking at 4th guy vs Jones. 

If Fields is available not sold the Falcons don't take him right there.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

Never...and we are not desperate 

only this board thinks that

They're really dumb if they'd say never. I'd gladly fleece a division rival if they were willing to grossly overpay.

Yeah, I'm sure Tepper is just thrilled that the more this organization gets his fingerprints on it the worse we look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They're really dumb if they'd say never. I'd gladly fleece a division rival if they were willing to grossly overpay.

Yeah, I'm sure Tepper is just thrilled that the more this organization gets his fingerprints on it the worse we look.

So now it’s our owner getting bashed...I’m not buying into any of this...you make a good sportswriter 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MechaZain said:

If I'm Atlanta's GM I trade the pick to a QB needy team for the double whammy of accruing assets and fuging the Panthers

I am fairly certain that is an option on their board.  As a matter of fact it should be an option on our board every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So glad we stuck it to the WFTs for culture.

Seriously, we need to deal with Miami or Cincinnati to get a QB.

Giving Trubiski a shot and trading back for a first rounder is starting to sound better and better---not a huge fan of the idea, but if we trade back after nabbing Trubiski, (2 years, $20m, est) we can use the 2 firsts in 2022 to grab a qb.  If he works out, great.

I know we want a QB now--but it is not playing out well for us at this time---looks a bit uncertain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/16/2021 at 5:44 PM, Basbear said:

Denver, SF, or NE are in the market with good picks.  Some wildcards like Pitt, Chicago, WFT, and no telling what Jets/Miami could pull off. 

 

On 3/16/2021 at 5:53 PM, mrcompletely11 said:

I dont think Denver goes qb.  I also think SF and NE are way too far back to move to 2,3, 4.  Aint no way the last 3 have the ammo to go up that high

 

On 3/16/2021 at 6:04 PM, Basbear said:

Denver has been in talks for many QBs and wanted Fitz also. Lock still acts like a rookie. I heard he puts in no film or lift time. They have soured on him, no matter the fluff. SF is 12th with future picks. NE could do the same about trading future 1s/2s. Bill always has comps and is used to drafting late. Loins and Philly could trade up for a QB too. Goff and hurts are not good enough not to stay put if you love Wilson Fields etc.  

machoman.gif.918a35185d0cacbcdced68b93acbb79a.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...