Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers lose FB Alex Armah


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BPF said:

To the saints is the worst part of this whole thing. He wasn't integral here, but I want to be able to root for former players and can't cheer for anything saints related. I guess at least it wasn't the falcons. 

He has loads of knowledge not just on the panthers offensive/strategies, but he was a 4-faze special teamer..... He called the blocks for kicking and punting, must re-name the calls now....

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints signed FB Alex Armah, formerly of the Panthers. 

Armah has only 29 career touches, but he was regarded as one of the league's better lead blockers in Carolina. He will be replacing Mike Burton in New Orleans. H-back sized at 6-foot-2, Armah could have a slightly bigger offensive role for the Saints. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Saints signed FB Alex Armah, formerly of the Panthers. 

Armah has only 29 career touches, but he was regarded as one of the league's better lead blockers in Carolina. He will be replacing Mike Burton in New Orleans. H-back sized at 6-foot-2, Armah could have a slightly bigger offensive role for the Saints. 

 

sure he was 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...