Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

Unless there is video or audio of the crime happening or confirmed messages of DW admitting it, we will never know if he did it or not. 

Simply being convicted of a crime doesn't mean you did. 

Simply being found not guilty of a crime doesn't mean you didn't do it. 

So all 20+ women are lying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So all 20+ women are lying?

How the fug would I know. 

It's possible they are all lying. 

It's also possible some or all aint lying. 

I wasn't there. 

At present, I haven't seen or heard of any evidence to make me think he did it. 

 

 

 

Edited by Agent Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Agent Blue said:

as expected, no substance lol

Are you this clueless? Most victims are scared or traumatized. People of power know what they are doing and know the victims are scared of what will happen if they try to turn them in...  Please move on from Watson and stop talking about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Agent Blue said:

Which part of that was inaccurate? 

Let me guess, you recommend people who have been assaulted to wait years and file civil suits huh?

Please go have this same conversation with some folks that you know that have been sexually assaulted. If you're open to growing, you'll learn a lot of reasons why some of the poo you're saying is super ignorant.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Icege said:

Please go have this same conversation with some folks that you know that have been sexually assaulted. If you're open to growing, you'll learn a lot of reasons why some of the poo you're saying is super ignorant.

Name 1 thing I said that was ignorant. 

All ive done was stated FACTS. 

1) Waiting to report a SA will only hinder the investigation and likelihood of the perpetrator being brought to justice. FACT

2) Not going to police and only filing a civil suit will make people more skeptical of your claims/intentions. FACT

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Are you this clueless? Most victims are scared or traumatized. People of power know what they are doing and know the victims are scared of what will happen if they try to turn them in...  Please move on from Watson and stop talking about this.

No where have I said people of SA were not scared or traumatized. 

No where have I said people of SA have no reasons why they choose to not report the crime. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

Name 1 thing I said that was ignorant. 

All ive done was stated FACTS. 

1) Waiting to report a SA will only hinder the investigation and likelihood of the perpetrator being brought to justice. FACT

2) Not going to police and only filing a civil suit will make people more skeptical of your claims/intentions. FACT

 

Before I answer, are you asking me to answer because you're open to learning or are you asking so that you can try to argue why it wasn't?

I'm not interested in screaming into the void during lunch, so if the latter I'll politely decline any further dialogue on it. If the former though, just lmk.

Edited by Icege
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

No where have I said people of SA were not scared or traumatized. 

No where have I said people of SA have no reasons why they choose to not report the crime. 

 

You started off with a “pretty simple” which is never the case. Then said the victims need to go to the police right away. If they are scared or traumatized, how can you expect them to do this? People close to me have been sexually assaulted and the damage it can do is intense. The best thing for us and the team to do is move on from Watson. If something crazy happens showing all of these women are part of some crazy hoax (highly unlikely) then we can start considering him again. Until then, we need to move on and let the courts handle it. Nothing good can come of defending a millionaire with 19 cases of sexual assault against him.

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...