Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles trade #6 pick to Dolphins


DFive
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, frankw said:

You'll need thicker skin than that to make it through another season my man. We have already witnessed Jimmy Clausen and David Carr wearing white gloves. This is child's play by comparison.

Not by the posts that im reading, and people talking about trading for Darnold?? LOL!! Ok, i will take a 4th in a heart beat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cardiackat88. said:

Seriously? 

A 10-6 record, while making very good moves over the last 3-5 years to set themselves up for many years of success?

 

Everyone is over here ball washing them and they didnt really do anything, not to mention Tua is still their QB. And remember, the Bills were the class of the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, davos said:

Maybe they want to secure Jamaar Chase knowing CIN is likely going Sewell/Slater.  They've got Austin Jackson.  Just spent a 1st on him and he looked good.

Either Chase or reunion with Tua and Devontae Willams. Flores did coach him in the Senior Bowl and he’d be lethal in their offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BleedinGreenNC said:

Thought this was a public forum? LOL!! Get ready for Teddy!

Well that stings.  😖  You know, until the Roger calls out the Jets pick, I would remain humble.  You guys are notorious for having blank, shocked looks on your faces after the pick is announced. 

200.gif

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, KendrickPanther said:

I wonder if the end result of all this is a really good pass rusher on the board when we pick. I'd love a tackle or a QB but it looks like there won't be any left.

I’m really hoping we can sign FA DT Jarran Reed (released from Seattle today). That would help our depth on the interior DL. I think we’re set @ pass rushers. This will allow us to focus on OL and DB (or QB if one’s available).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...