Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Niners likely taking mac jones


Panthers8969
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Mainter said:

SF might have traded up for Wilson if they know that Jets will not be selecting a QB. Close ties between SF and Jets.

Will be interesting to see

The 49ers traded up to number three because they know the Jets are not moving off of taking Wilson at number two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

The 49ers traded up to number three because they know the Jets are not moving off of taking Wilson at number two.

But why #3?  I guess the NFL is WAY higher on Jones than a lot of us are.  Even if the Niners thought we would take him at #8, they didn't have to jump all the way up to #3 to secure him.

This still baffles me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

The Niners are either going to look like geniuses in a few years or like complete morons.   There's no middle ground on this move from my perspective.

They are going for broke, and I don't blame them.

Play in a VERY tough division right now, with all of the other 3 teams either having good or great QB play, and have a roster ready to win now.

If they played it safe, the GM and HC would be out of a job in a year or two.  McVey doing the exact same thing, going for broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

They are going for broke, and I don't blame them.

Play in a VERY tough division right now, with all of the other 3 teams either having good or great QB play, and have a roster ready to win now.

If they played it safe, the GM and HC would be out of a job in a year or two.  McVey doing the exact same thing, going for broke.

If Mac Jones ends up playing like I think he will, they may be out of a job in a year or two anyhow for passing up on Fields and Lance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

Old news. Mac Jones will be a 49ers. 
 

#1 Jax - Trevor Lawrence 

#2 Car - Zach Wilson 

#3 SF - Mac Jones

#4 Atl - Justin Fields 

#5 Den - Trey Lance

#6 Mia - Kyle Pitts

#7 Det - Micah Parsons

#8 Nyj - Penei Sewell

#9 Cin - Jamarr Chase 

#10 Dal - Patrick Surtain

It is not news until it happens--and if there are other possibilities.  Come on man--sharing updated information is not something that should be treated with dickism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If Mac Jones ends up playing like I think he will, they may be out of a job in a year or two anyhow for passing up on Fields and Lance.

I'm not buying that they are taking Jones, what I'm buying is that the 9ers found out that 1 and 2 were not going to be able to be bought, so they got the next best thing...the option to pick one of the 3 of their choosing.

They MAY know who that player is already, but I doubt it.  They were buying the opportunity, not the player yet...me thinks.

This month, they will do a deep dive and figure out which if the 3 they want to select.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The 49ers traded up to number three because they know the Jets are not moving off of taking Wilson at number two.

I believe that too, just cant exclude the other options. The point is I believe SF knows exactly what Jets Will do.

Personally I believe that SF traded up for Fields most likely, maybe Wilson. I dont believe that Mac will be their Guy at All.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mainter said:

I believe that too, just cant exclude the other options. The point is I believe SF knows exactly what Jets Will do.

Personally I believe that SF traded up for Fields most likely, maybe Wilson. I dont believe that Mac will be their Guy at All.

It's not my belief. Albert Breer reported it.

The Jets and 49ers staffs are well acquainted, including the GMs. The Niners know they have no shot at Wilson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's how I look at the Niners taking Mac Jones situation; that's one team off the board for another QB or OT to be there for us at #8.  That means only ONE TEAM, just one has to take another position other than QB or OT for us get one of those very two targets.  Meaning it will be extremely likely we get to have a shot at either a QB or OT, if not a choice of the two.

So yeah, I'm all about the Niners taking Mac Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did want to correct one thing though...someone in this thread said that the QB in Shanny's system has to be athletic, that's simply not true.

 

Some of his best years was with Schaub, Ryan, and Cousins.  I wouldn't consider any of them to be more than a decent athlete...at best.

Not saying that Jones is the guy, but I bet Shanny thinks he can win with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

I did want to correct one thing though...someone in this thread said that the QB in Shanny's system has to be athletic, that's simply not true.

Some of his best years was with Schaub, Ryan, and Cousins.  I wouldn't consider any of them to be more than a decent athlete...at best.

Not saying that Jones is the guy, but I bet Shanny thinks he can win with him.

People have said the same thing about our system, including a few specifically saying that you needed a Cam Newton type of quarterback to make this system work.

That's a statement that pretty clearly says someone doesn't know what they're talking about.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CanePantherHornet said:

Mac Jones is safer than Fields. 

Fields is like a flashy sports car.  He looks good in the highlights but when you really look in to him he is not reliable at all, makes constant mental mistakes, and underperformed massively considering all the talent around him. 

Mac Jones may be a Honda Civic but sometimes that's all you need.

LOL.  "underperformed massively"?!?!?!?  In what way did he underperform massively.  He led his team to an undefeated season up until the National Championship game - two years in a row!  This year he's at 22 TD vs 6 INT's, 70% completion rate over eight games.  Last year 41 TD's vs 3 INT's at 67% passing.

Even in the Bama game, did you watch it?  His line did him ZERO favors, his receivers were dropping the ball left and right, and the defense crapped the bed.  You can't ask any team to put up 53 points against St Nick's defense.  

He's a good player, who is . . . wait for it . . . 20 - 2.  He has ONLY ever lost in the NC game.  Yes, last year's NC game he has to shoulder some blame for that.  But not this year.  NC game winners average giving up 19 points.  Fields put up 24; something only two other teams all year did against Bama.

I don't love Fields like I do Lawrence and Wilson, but he's easily the third best QB in this draft.  I would be THRILLED if we someone landed him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...