Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Houston police opening investigation on Deshaun Watson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/3/2021 at 12:40 AM, top dawg said:

 

There are many masseuses singing praises about his character and saying that they don't believe this. This is a long way from settled, much less over. All the defense has to do is impugn this woman's character/story, and this whole thing can swiftly turn into a house of cards.

So you mean all they have to do is prove she's a whore and spread that through the media to get him off like rapestburger. Yeah people have woke to this and attacking victims character isn't going to fly. Thank God people aren't so archaic now and actually believe the women. 

Edited by Snake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, top dawg said:

Of course if it can be proved that this woman (and other women) in this lawsuit were involved in consensual sex acts sex acts with other clients, that could have repercussions in the Watson case. So admitting that he had consensual sex could in fact help his case out a lot. 

IMO this is the No 1. reason why the names are being withheld.  It will be interesting to see how many of these women have had sex with their customers or offered a "Happy Ending" to their massage.

Quote

An old man once told me, on several occasions, "Variety is the spice of life!"

Also this would give a valid reason why there were so many?  

While I am certain that many women are professional and keep their sexual life out of their profession. There are many that use the job title as a way to lure men to pay for the additional service.

Please don't tell me they don't exist because I have experienced the offer from this profession.  I won't divulge in whether I accepted or not.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Snake said:

So you mean all they have to do is prove she's a whore and spread that through the media to get him off like rapestburger. Yeah people have woke to this and attacking victims character isn't going to fly. Thank God people aren't so archaic now and actually believe the women. 

How can people "believe the women" if we don't have any details or have heard the other side? 

And you think that rushing to judgment before you know all the facts is OK? That's disturbing, dude!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

How can people "believe the women" if we don't have any details or have heard the other side? 

And you think that rushing to judgment before you know all the facts is OK? That's disturbing, dude!

How is it disturbing believing a victim of a crime? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Snake said:

How is it disturbing believing a victim of a crime? 

Because it's the star QB. Same old story forever.  They want nobody  jumping  to judge their guy but will call numerous others whores at the same 

 

Edited by Moo Daeng
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Because it's the star QB. Same old story forever.  They want nobody  jumping  to judge their guy but will call numerous others whores at the same 

 

No, some of us actually believe in the theory behind American jurisprudence (which has its origins in English common law), even if hypocrites don't mete it out fairly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hulu +Live: $88.78 Amazon Prime: $16.00 (w/FanDuel: $36.12) Apple TV+: $10.66 Netflix:$26.68 Is all still $80 less per month than what I was paying for DirecTV when I gave it up a few years ago. 
    • I just don't know that he has the time to turn it around at his age. His age is going to be a major strike against him in the recruiting trail and it's just a tough row to hoe to turn a football program around. One good recruiting class can turn around a basketball team. Hell, one individual recruit can turna around a basketball team - Carmelo Anthony basically won a national championship single handedly at Syracuse. Cam at Auburn is the only college who even comes close to that type of impact off the top of my head. A good recruiting class is 2-3 years down the road from significantly impacting a college football program... if you can actually keep them around. The instant impact is in the portal but everyone else is chasing those guys too. If I was building a college program, I'd focus almost exclusively on the trenches starting out. To me, that's the big difference in college. The better teams dominate the trenches. There's just a LOT more talent disparity at the college level than there is the NFL level. The worst teams in the NFL are still full of guys who were all conference or all American at the college level. The gap between the best team in the NFL and the tenth best team in the NFL is pretty small. A couple of plays might be the difference. The #1 team in the country is probably going to be a 10 point favorite over the #10 team at the college level. The gap on talent between the #1 team and the #32 team is a massive gulf. The #1 team's backups would be competitive against the #32 team. I just don't know if Belichick after a career in the NFL was prepared for the level of talent disparity he was going to face.
    • I wouldn't drop David Moore, honestly. Moore, while long in the tooth and light in production, is about the only veteran presence in the WR room now and the only one with extensive experience with what Canales wants and needs. And that's probably why he made the roster. Still, aging safeties who might make a decent gunner just aren't where you want to spend your money and roster spots. Even at vet minimum, he's not going to be as cheap or maybe as trainable as some UDFA who would run through a brick wall for a roster spot for rookie league minimum and a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...