Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sewell

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

vanilla B Rookie

vanilla B

Posted
Posted

If ones available at 8 I’m for it but ever since seeing how some of the “can’t miss” OL prospects of the 2013 draft turned out I’ve always been opposed to trading up for OL.  Too much quality talent at 8 regardless to make it worth giving up any more capital, especially after giving up next years 2nd for Darnold.  If Cincy takes Sewell then take Slater, Parsons, or next BPA at 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)

I stay at 8, counting on 4-5 QBs to go before us--

  • Jax:  Trevor.
  • NYJ Wilson. 
  • SF Jones (Still feeling it--you people mocked me over this guy.  Mocked me!)
  • ATL (trade?) Lance is my guess, but they could go with Pitts or Sewell as well. 
  • Cincy should go with Sewell, BUT they could take Chase (Burrows wants him) or Pitts.  Burrows wants weaponry, it seems. However, if they do not pick Sewell, word on the street says that the Panthers will. (my street--in front of my house)
  • TRADE:  Miami is going WR or edge rusher-Chase is the pick here unless they trade back with Denver or someone for Fields.  Prediction: Denver (trade)for QB Fields.
  • Detroit needs a whole team of WRs.  They go WR.  Chase has to be the pick here. 
  • CAROLINA:  Someone good is going to be there--Pitts, Slater, and / or Sewell, maybe?  Go LT.

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I stay at 8, counting on 4-5 QBs to go before us--

  • Jax:  Trevor.
  • NYJ Wilson. 
  • SF Jones (Still feeling it--you people mocked me over this guy.  Mocked me!)
  • ATL (trade?) Lance is my guess, but they could go with Pitts or Sewell as well. 
  • Cincy should go with Sewell, BUT they could take Chase (Burrows wants him) or Pitts.  Burrows wants weaponry, it seems. However, if they do not pick Sewell, word on the street says that the Panthers will. (my street--in front of my house)
  • TRADE:  Miami is going WR or edge rusher-Chase is the pick here unless they trade back with Denver or someone for Fields.  Prediction: Denver (trade)for QB Fields.
  • Detroit needs a whole team of WRs.  They go WR.  Chase has to be the pick here. 
  • CAROLINA:  Someone good is going to be there--Pitts, Slater, and / or Sewell, maybe?  Go LT.

 

If you're not looking for QB 8 is a good place to be. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Draft cheat sheet for people who only want the best for their Panthers:

The Draft starts at pick #3---Trevor and Wilson will be flying to Jax and NY, respectively, when SF goes to the podium, so lets start here:

3.  SF:  We want them to pick Jones.  If they do not, Jones likely goes after #8. 

4.  ATLANTA:  Now that we have a QB and prolly will not take one, we want them to take a QB--Lance, maybe? I think they like him.

5.  CINCINNATI:  Please take Chase.  Listen to your QB.  He misses him.

6.  MIAMI: They need WR or Edge Rusher, so they could reach for hometown boy Rousseau or take one of Tua's Bama mates Waddle or Smith.  All of these are OK and we will allow it.

7.  DETROIT:  They could use a WR too.  Let's hope for a run on WRs or maybe MLB Parsons.

8. CAROLINA:  Today's buffet features Sewell, Slater, Pitts, and any CB you want.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Sewell or Slater in the 1st best secondary piece in the 2nd. Safety or CB. Then a road grading guard in the 3rd for me. 

Lotta possibilities for that guard.  Heck, a few RT candidates could fill that need--like Dant'e Smith, ECU.

I hope we draft Mills, QB, Stanford in round 3 if he is there.

6 minutes ago, Snake said:

If you're not looking for QB 8 is a good place to be. 

If you will take Sewell or Slater (no preference) you could trade back a spot or two.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Our 2nd Most Productive WR

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I encourage you to go back and watch his college play. Notice how he immediately backpedals to 10 yards behind the LOS on almost every snap. You can't do that in the NFL. Your OTs have no chance of keeping those freak show edge rushers off of you. You can't create a pocket that deep. Bryce can chuck it when he has an airport runway in front of him to step up into. There's a reason why "ease of creating velocity" is such a talking point evaluating QBs. It's not how hard or how far you can throw the ball given a perfect situation. It's how hard and how far you can throw the ball in a typical NFL game situation and that's where a lot of my concerns with Bryce were going into the draft. There were way too many plays in his college tape that if you were watching that purely in terms of translating it to the NFL it just didn't work.
    • LinvilleGorge
      cam Newton makes his return to Madden football

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Yeah, like I said I get it. From a revenue perspective I'm not a good customer for them. They've probably intentionally tanked offline franchise mode to try to get people online. Again, not a terrible strategy from a pure business perspective. I can't really be mad at them for doing what's good for business but yeah, from my perspective it still sucks.
    • cranky
      Our 2nd Most Productive WR

      By cranky · Posted

      Ok let me be more specific. Smith was a stud before Newton got here do you not agree? Yes, LaFell improved under Cam but then had his best years after leaving the Panthers with Cam as the QB and going to NE. So he improved playing with someone else. Olsen was in Chicage the year before Cam arrived and statistically had the same numbers his first year with Cam.  Hope that's clearer for you.
×
×
  • Create New...