Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sewell

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

vanilla B Rookie

vanilla B

Posted
Posted

If ones available at 8 I’m for it but ever since seeing how some of the “can’t miss” OL prospects of the 2013 draft turned out I’ve always been opposed to trading up for OL.  Too much quality talent at 8 regardless to make it worth giving up any more capital, especially after giving up next years 2nd for Darnold.  If Cincy takes Sewell then take Slater, Parsons, or next BPA at 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)

I stay at 8, counting on 4-5 QBs to go before us--

  • Jax:  Trevor.
  • NYJ Wilson. 
  • SF Jones (Still feeling it--you people mocked me over this guy.  Mocked me!)
  • ATL (trade?) Lance is my guess, but they could go with Pitts or Sewell as well. 
  • Cincy should go with Sewell, BUT they could take Chase (Burrows wants him) or Pitts.  Burrows wants weaponry, it seems. However, if they do not pick Sewell, word on the street says that the Panthers will. (my street--in front of my house)
  • TRADE:  Miami is going WR or edge rusher-Chase is the pick here unless they trade back with Denver or someone for Fields.  Prediction: Denver (trade)for QB Fields.
  • Detroit needs a whole team of WRs.  They go WR.  Chase has to be the pick here. 
  • CAROLINA:  Someone good is going to be there--Pitts, Slater, and / or Sewell, maybe?  Go LT.

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I stay at 8, counting on 4-5 QBs to go before us--

  • Jax:  Trevor.
  • NYJ Wilson. 
  • SF Jones (Still feeling it--you people mocked me over this guy.  Mocked me!)
  • ATL (trade?) Lance is my guess, but they could go with Pitts or Sewell as well. 
  • Cincy should go with Sewell, BUT they could take Chase (Burrows wants him) or Pitts.  Burrows wants weaponry, it seems. However, if they do not pick Sewell, word on the street says that the Panthers will. (my street--in front of my house)
  • TRADE:  Miami is going WR or edge rusher-Chase is the pick here unless they trade back with Denver or someone for Fields.  Prediction: Denver (trade)for QB Fields.
  • Detroit needs a whole team of WRs.  They go WR.  Chase has to be the pick here. 
  • CAROLINA:  Someone good is going to be there--Pitts, Slater, and / or Sewell, maybe?  Go LT.

 

If you're not looking for QB 8 is a good place to be. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Draft cheat sheet for people who only want the best for their Panthers:

The Draft starts at pick #3---Trevor and Wilson will be flying to Jax and NY, respectively, when SF goes to the podium, so lets start here:

3.  SF:  We want them to pick Jones.  If they do not, Jones likely goes after #8. 

4.  ATLANTA:  Now that we have a QB and prolly will not take one, we want them to take a QB--Lance, maybe? I think they like him.

5.  CINCINNATI:  Please take Chase.  Listen to your QB.  He misses him.

6.  MIAMI: They need WR or Edge Rusher, so they could reach for hometown boy Rousseau or take one of Tua's Bama mates Waddle or Smith.  All of these are OK and we will allow it.

7.  DETROIT:  They could use a WR too.  Let's hope for a run on WRs or maybe MLB Parsons.

8. CAROLINA:  Today's buffet features Sewell, Slater, Pitts, and any CB you want.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Sewell or Slater in the 1st best secondary piece in the 2nd. Safety or CB. Then a road grading guard in the 3rd for me. 

Lotta possibilities for that guard.  Heck, a few RT candidates could fill that need--like Dant'e Smith, ECU.

I hope we draft Mills, QB, Stanford in round 3 if he is there.

6 minutes ago, Snake said:

If you're not looking for QB 8 is a good place to be. 

If you will take Sewell or Slater (no preference) you could trade back a spot or two.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PleaseCutStewart
      Draft Week Rumors, Leaks and Media Draftniks Final Mocks

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • Panthers Fan 69
      Canes vs Sens Rd 1 GM 2 Monday 7:30pm

      By Panthers Fan 69 · Posted

      I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • ForJimmy
      Draft Week Rumors, Leaks and Media Draftniks Final Mocks

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...