Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets had an earlier offer on the table


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

There is virtually zero connection to the past other than the stadium. Unless you are superstitious I don't see how it's relevant. 

 

Exactly!!! Also the uniforms but I'm hoping that will come up soon too. I would love to get rid of the Silver. Especially the helmets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New coach + new GM + new QB = cautious optimism. 
 

I also only started the clock on Tepper when he hired Rhule. Two years prior was just a learning curve and inherited a mess of an organization from top to bottom.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What in our franchise history has some of this fanbase based their cockiness on? I mean, what am I missing? Where does this confidence come from?

Looking at our history from an outsider's point of view, it looks to me like we stumbled back assward into a handful of good years while largely sucking.

Panthers are in the top half of the league in playoff appearances in the last 20 years, and only 4 teams have more Superbowl appearances.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Panthers are in the top half of the league in playoff appearances in the last 20 years, and only 4 teams have more Superbowl appearances.

We're tied for 17th in playoff appearances since 2000, so middle of the pack. We're 18th in wins and have a sub-.500 winning percentage since 2000. Yes, we went to two Super Bowls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're tied for 17th in playoff appearances since 2000, so middle of the pack. We're 18th in wins and have a sub-.500 winning percentage since 2000. Yes, we went to two Super Bowls. 

It's actually tied for 12th in playoff appearances 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're tied for 17th in playoff appearances since 2000, so middle of the pack. We're 18th in wins and have a sub-.500 winning percentage since 2000. Yes, we went to two Super Bowls. 

Also wins don't matter as much as playoff appearances in determining whether your team is successful.

I have given you a solid reason why fans should be proud of their team and you still try to downplay it.  I think you just like to be in misery.

Edited by jfra78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jfra78 said:

Also wins don't matter as much as playoff appearances in determining whether your team is successful.

I have you a solid reason why fans should be proud of their team and you still try to downplay it.  I think you just like to be in misery.

I'm just being realistic. This organization has never achieved sustain success. We've sporadically had some good seasons and then got overall very poor return out of the career of an MVP QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ties go to the bottom, not the top.

No you are wrong ties go to the top.  You can't be tied for 2nd and be no first.  If this was the case, no one could ever be tied for first

Edited by jfra78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...