Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are You Really Against Fields or Lance if they fall to #8...


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

But its rooted in fact and speculation

Just wow. I other words, you have no clue.  Speculation yes, fact, no.  If you take what you read on the internet as fact especially 2,3,4 persons removed for the 'source', then I feel for you.  That's even if the source is being 100% truthful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Just wow. I other words, you have no clue.  Speculation yes, fact, no.  If you take what you read on the internet as fact especially 2,3,4 persons removed for the 'source', then I feel for you.  That's even if the source is being 100% truthful.

It's a fact that nobody from the Panthers are at his 2nd pro day.  That's telling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lance reminds me of mahomes but when someone becomes a star they always look for the next mahomes but there is only one so I got lance as a bust I love darnold and will sacrifice 3 years to see if he can live up to the hype . At right now it’s like we drafted a top 5 qb in darnold he’s basically a rookie . We need Sewell if he’s there slater is overrated. Take best player it would be a land slide if pitts falls but that’s great but how does one pan out taking a tight end early big tisk risk look at oj Howard .idk who I want Idk for the first time who we get but I love surprises and who ever we get I’ll be happy and excited for all the summer posts of him in training camp .

I can’t wait keep pounding it’s going to be a great show come draft day 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

25 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:
Trey Lance will go #4 overall regardless of what team owns the pick. Falcons, Broncos, WFT, or Patriots.

 

45 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It's a fact that nobody from the Panthers are at his 2nd pro day.  That's telling

Maybe the Panthers know he's not going to be there at #8, so why bother?  According to you he's such a risk, but yet he could very possibly go ahead of Fields at #4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

 

 

Maybe the Panthers know he's not going to be there at #8, so why bother?  According to you he's such a risk, but yet he could very possibly go ahead of Fields at #4. 

I like lance.  I think he will be there at 8.  However he is a long long way from being a nfl starter.  That's not really debatable.  I also think rhule and Co either didn't like what they saw or didn't want a huge project at pick 8.  Maybe both.   

 

From what I heard and read this past week it sounds like fields is going to be dropping.  Lots of noise about his throwing motion and slow going through progressions.   Listen to Chris simms break him down on the ringer podcast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

That wasn't opening day of offseason training either.  Again, they were there for the first one, that should be enough.  Not everyone had a second Pro Day, actually, nearly all prospects don't.

If they were interested they would have used that opportunity.  Don't kid yourself 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...