Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's 2021 Mock Draft


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't overlook Arthur Smith's interest in Pitts.  ATL is the wildcard.

TOTALLY agree DET is the likely trade down team and CIN goes Chase. 

For Miami, with Pitts gone, I see them targeting Waddle.  They need a playmaker to pair with Tua and see what he's got.  Their trade back up was to ensure a top-3 playmaker.

Even with my counter points, we are still looking at Sewell, Slater, all CBs, Smith WR, and maybe the last remaining R1 QB. 

Sewell could very well happen for us.

Edited by saX man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheProcess said:

Just a question for clarity.....why is Micah Parsons, who is the most talented defensive player in the draft not in the 1st round at all?  

My guy has told me that Parsons is off their board entirely. Other teams have issues with him as well. Just takes one team though. I don't actually foresee him falling out of the first round. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

My guy has told me that Parsons is off their board entirely. Other teams have issues with him as well. Just takes one team though. I don't actually foresee him falling out of the first round. 

our Gross Matos was part of one of those red flags with him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A random thought but I wouldn't be opposed to targeting Eichenburg in a trade-up if Fields falls to us.  Then trade down in the 3rd to gain lost picks.  Between Mayfield, Eichenburg, Cosmi, and Radunz, there is some really promising OT talent with our second pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3. San Francisco 49ers
Mac Jones, QB, ALA 
Nat's notes:  I have been saying this since they traded up, Mac is the guy. Internet scouts (including me) severely underrate the level at which he played QB this year. The more tape you watch on him the more it makes sense. Mac Jones is the #3 QB on multiple boards, including ours. 

 

I've been beating this drum for a while now, but yeah, Jones is the third best QB in this draft and a guy I thought we'd try hard for. Darnold makes this tougher, but if Jones should happen to get past San Fran and falls, I still think we pick him up.

If not, Sewell/Slater is definitely the long term best move.

Edited by Khyber53
  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, saX man said:

A random thought but I wouldn't be opposed to targeting Eichenburg in a trade-up if Fields falls to us.  Then trade down in the 3rd to gain lost picks.  Between Mayfield, Eichenburg, Cosmi, and Radunz, there is some really promising OT talent with our second pick.

Or we could just, you know, take the best tackle on the board when we have the chance.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...