Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer also has us taking Fields, believes Tepper is pushing for it.


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

My understanding is Teddy had a total of $10,000,000 of guaranteed money left on his Panthers deal and that he's going to collect all of it -- that's not a pay cut.  If I'm incorrect please do fill me in.   

Personally I hoped he wouldn't be traded but I certainly didn't guarantee it would never happen.

I predicted Hurney would stick and when he didn't I was first-in taking credit for being wrong. 

This guy @Mr. Scot is a complete blowhard who is literally the single least-informed person on earth as it goes to how guys like Tepper go about conducting business...

...he is however a 1st ballot Hall of Famer as it goes to screen time and sheer volume of posts! (and we're talking a decade+ track record, Tom Brady like I tell ya!)

Good onya Scot!

 


He took the paycut to just the guaranteed money for this trade to work. If he stayed a Panther he would make even more. Sounds like he knew he would get cut if this trade didn’t work and lose the money anyway, but that’s just me speculating...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So we'll take that as none, no, no, no, and no.  Obviously you're not an accredited investor.   

Our argument here isn't about "football"...

...it's about business operations. 

Tepper has 100% overlayed/installed the Appaloosa Model on/in the Panthers organization and this is perfectly clear to everyone, everywhere...except you Mr. Ostrich.

In the other thread you did confirm that Fitterer reports to Rhule, right?

Is sizzle buzz, slang for smoking crack??

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smittymoose said:

He would have gotten $10M to sit on his couch for a year too

Yeah now he has a chance to push Lock and get some playing time, possibly get a nice contract next year. He doesn’t strike me as a stat at home and not play kind of guy. Most of these guys are competitive and love playing the game, it’s how they hit here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Whether he will or won't influence the decision, don't know.

What I do know is that he shouldn't, and if he's smart, he won't.

And to be clear, we don't know for sure what he wants, but I'd say that even if he agreed with everything I think they should do. I'm not gonna change my opinion on owner interference depending on whether he agrees with me or not. It's bad either way.

Let the football people do their jobs.

I'm in the group that thinks Tepper is not telling them who to select but telling them to find the future franchise QB, whoever Fits thinks that guy could be.  I'm sure QB is at the top of the list of priorities. 

Remember, Fit said that he believed you draft a qb every draft.  They will take a QB at some point in this draft and every draft going forward until they get the franchise and his heir on the roster.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moo Daeng said:

I want to see Mister Scot tell Tepper to his face that he shouldn't have any say in his investment.

That woukd be a bloodbath.

I'd be more than happy to. You actually think there'd be some danger in that? 😄

What a stupid post, but considering the source...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...