Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Total cost for Teddy


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Looks like we are going to eat $7m of Teddy's contract this year.

 

That would bring the total cost for 1 year of Teddy to $31m.  $8m in 2020 salary, $1m in workout and game bonuses.  $15m signing bonus.  $7m of guaranteed salary this year we are turning into another bonus.

Teddy Bridgewater Contract Details, Salary Cap Charges, Bonus Money, and Contract History | Over The Cap

Also we lost a 3rd, from missing out on a comp pick, but we did get a 6th back.

Hindsight is always 20/20 but fair to say it was a terrible decision.

 

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Entirely disagree. 

No deal:

We pay Teddy $21 mil 2021, still on the books for 2022

With a post-J1 cut:

2021: $15 mil dead cap, clear $7.9 mil in cap space

2022: $5 mil dead cap and we’ve got $21 mil more to spend.

With deal:

2021: Gain 6th rounder, gain $6 mil in cap (yes though more dead cap is eaten that was GOING TO HIM ANYWAYS)

2022: $26 mil freed

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, davos said:

Entirely disagree. 

No deal:

We pay Teddy $21 mil 2021, still on the books for 2022

With a post-J1 cut:

2021: $15 mil dead cap, clear $7.9 mil in cap space

2022: $5 mil dead cap and we’ve got $21 mil more to spend.

With deal:

2021: Gain 6th rounder, gain $6 mil in cap (yes though more dead cap is eaten that was GOING TO HIM ANYWAYS)

2022: $26 mil freed

There is nothing to disagree with, you are looking at cap space relative to what would have been his cap cost for this year and next if he would have stayed on the team.

My post is stating how much we paid him for his one year of play.  If we are really responsible for $7m this year we will spend $31m for his one year of play.  $24m has already been paid to him, and it looks like we will have to pay him $7m more.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Hindsight is always 20/20 but fair to say it was a terrible decision.

Signing Teddy in the first place and how he performed was a bad deal. The trade to Denver is a good deal. We have paid Teddy way to much for how he performed. 

I hope he does well in Denver and wish him the best but I am glad he is gone.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

Oh I misread, if you're saying this being his total cost for his panthers' stay then yep, totally agree.  Thought you were saying the trade was misguided.

Nope, the trade makes sense, and we will save a little bit of money.

Looks to be a good trade for Denver, if his salary is only $3m this year.

Also looks like this 2022 salary voided as part of the deal according to www.spotrac.com .  That might mean if he walks they might get a comp pick for him.

Teddy Bridgewater Contract Breakdowns, Salary Cap Figures, Salaries, Bonuses | Spotrac

They gave up a 6th round pick for Teddy at $3m and they might get a better pick back if he walks.  That is how you do a "bridge" QB.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Short has no business still being on there. That was the no brainer of all no brainers last year. I can at least excuse Teddy if they actually thought he’d be good but Short made no sense at all because he wasn’t close to worth the extra $13M.

going to be interesting on here when we cant complain about dead cap anymore.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

It will be nice. You always have dead cap (most of it is built into overall cap hits), but Marty was truly impressive. $30M of our $39M in 2021 dead cap was from people signed in 2020 or not cut in 2020. I mean that’s just awful decision making when you are cutting people 1 year after signing them to starter deals and do it multiple times every year.

yeah deadcap was pretty consistent and cancerous here. Im excited to see what the team will do with a cap where 85% + is available to be utilized. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...