Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some Fields Perspective


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here's a draft grade I saw that I think was pretty spot on.

 

No. 8: Carolina Panthers: Jaycee Horn, CB, South Carolina

You know the Panthers are devastated by getting thiiiis close to Penei Sewell and missing out. It’s almost like the shock spooked them into making a pick, and it’s the wrong one. I don’t care if there’s an argument to putting Horn above Patrick Surtain II, the Panthers just put all their faith in quarterback in a Sam Darnold reclamation project and left Justin Fields on the board. Taking Fields would have been a tough choice too, but this was unquestionably a bad one. Not trading out of the pick, not gambling on upside. It was safe, and Carolina needed to take a swing.

Grade: D

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

If it makes anyone feel better the same GM who traded up to get Fields traded up to get Trubisky while Watson and Mahomes were on the board. Not exactly great QB evaluators there.

Rhule so far has chosen Teddy and Darnold...I would take Trubisky and Fields over those 2.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Here's a draft grade I saw that I think was pretty spot on.

 

No. 8: Carolina Panthers: Jaycee Horn, CB, South Carolina

You know the Panthers are devastated by getting thiiiis close to Penei Sewell and missing out. It’s almost like the shock spooked them into making a pick, and it’s the wrong one. I don’t care if there’s an argument to putting Horn above Patrick Surtain II, the Panthers just put all their faith in quarterback in a Sam Darnold reclamation project and left Justin Fields on the board. Taking Fields would have been a tough choice too, but this was unquestionably a bad one. Not trading out of the pick, not gambling on upside. It was safe, and Carolina needed to take a swing.

Grade: D

Thats a bit harsh. 

 

I do wish we could have offered our third to Det to flip picks.  That might have worked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Whom pretty much everyone says was a reach at 8

The Panthers didn't think so.

And I don't really give a sh-t what everyone thinks until we see them take the field. There are few things in this world more useless than draft grades in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shotgun said:

Here's a draft grade I saw that I think was pretty spot on.

 

No. 8: Carolina Panthers: Jaycee Horn, CB, South Carolina

You know the Panthers are devastated by getting thiiiis close to Penei Sewell and missing out. It’s almost like the shock spooked them into making a pick, and it’s the wrong one. I don’t care if there’s an argument to putting Horn above Patrick Surtain II, the Panthers just put all their faith in quarterback in a Sam Darnold reclamation project and left Justin Fields on the board. Taking Fields would have been a tough choice too, but this was unquestionably a bad one. Not trading out of the pick, not gambling on upside. It was safe, and Carolina needed to take a swing.

Grade: D

Just for anyone who's curious where this came from and how the individual who wrote the grade feels about the rest of the round (ya know, context):

https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2021/4/29/22409582/nfl-draft-2021-results-pick-by-pick-grades-first-round

Myself I'm not sure that taking (arguably) the best (or best fit for this division) player at his position AND plugging a huge area of need on this team qualifies as one of the 4 worst picks in the draft.  Maybe it ends up being that way but Dator believes only 2 picks are worse and one is equally bad?  k.  It's a silly take and its done its job I suppose.  

I'm equally not sure that James Dator is so plugged in he could declare that the team was "spooked" - that's beyond silly.  No way that they just went "well Sewell is gone and no one wants to trade for this pick - so we're just gonna take the next guy on our board" right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mwright350 said:

Just for anyone who's curious where this came from and how the individual who wrote the grade feels about the rest of the round (ya know, context):

https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2021/4/29/22409582/nfl-draft-2021-results-pick-by-pick-grades-first-round

Myself I'm not sure that taking (arguably) the best (or best fit for this division) player at his position AND plugging a huge area of need on this team qualifies as one of the 4 worst picks in the draft.  Maybe it ends up being that way but Dator believes only 2 picks are worse and one is equally bad?  k.  It's a silly take and its done its job I suppose.  

I'm equally not sure that James Dator is so plugged in he could declare that the team was "spooked" - that's beyond silly.  No way that they just went "well Sewell is gone and no one wants to trade for this pick - so we're just gonna take the next guy on our board" right?

I agree with his assessment other than the spooked part, that does seem silly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mwright350 said:

Just for anyone who's curious where this came from and how the individual who wrote the grade feels about the rest of the round (ya know, context):

https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2021/4/29/22409582/nfl-draft-2021-results-pick-by-pick-grades-first-round

Myself I'm not sure that taking (arguably) the best (or best fit for this division) player at his position AND plugging a huge area of need on this team qualifies as one of the 4 worst picks in the draft.  Maybe it ends up being that way but Dator believes only 2 picks are worse and one is equally bad?  k.  It's a silly take and its done its job I suppose.  

I'm equally not sure that James Dator is so plugged in he could declare that the team was "spooked" - that's beyond silly.  No way that they just went "well Sewell is gone and no one wants to trade for this pick - so we're just gonna take the next guy on our board" right?

That was Dator?

No wonder it sounded stupid.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mwright350 said:

Just for anyone who's curious where this came from and how the individual who wrote the grade feels about the rest of the round (ya know, context):

https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2021/4/29/22409582/nfl-draft-2021-results-pick-by-pick-grades-first-round

Myself I'm not sure that taking (arguably) the best (or best fit for this division) player at his position AND plugging a huge area of need on this team qualifies as one of the 4 worst picks in the draft.  Maybe it ends up being that way but Dator believes only 2 picks are worse and one is equally bad?  k.  It's a silly take and its done its job I suppose.  

I'm equally not sure that James Dator is so plugged in he could declare that the team was "spooked" - that's beyond silly.  No way that they just went "well Sewell is gone and no one wants to trade for this pick - so we're just gonna take the next guy on our board" right?

fuging Dator.

He literally has no idea what he's talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's a bit dumb.

They weren't "spooked" into making a pick. They just took the next guy on their board.

I've no idea how they felt about Sewell - considering they passed over Slater too, who actually knows.

That said, I've no doubt they were working the phones hard for those 10 minutes.

In the end they didn't get a trade down offer they liked so took the best player on their board - which just so happened to be a CB with tremendous upside. The only reason Dator is finding fault with that is because he's one of those "if you don't have a franchise QB you might as well blow it all up" guys. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not to sure it's a solid argument to try to estimate what he will do this season, BUT he's had a solid 3 years in the league. Here's his numbers compared to Jewell's for the same time period. I can see the logic of getting a starting MLB for a (at best) WR4. AT, XL and Tmac are certainly our top 3 guys IN 2025. Certainly worth pondering.
    • Training camp just started and it's already starting... https://www.facebook.com/reel/24277303321904901/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v LOL No one believes you and you have fan pages sharing this with a "Play him or trade him" headline. Oh wee mayne. This is why no front offices wanted any part of this.
    • Honestly, it only makes sense if you're trying to chase being the best bad team you can be this year. The number one question we need answered this season is whether or not Bryce is our long-term franchise QB. Trading away a second year WR who was second on the team in catch percentage, first in yards per target, and who clearly outplayed your 1st round pick for a likely one year rental fill in LB is exactly the type of short sighted desperation moves that has made us the worst franchise in the league under Tepper. We gotta stop making these types of moves and just focus on building a good organization and a good roster. Lloyd is a JAG LB another bad team and awful defense is wavering on and a couple of Panthers fans are salivating over him. Oof. We just need to be patient and wait. Definitely make some calls around the league to teams deep at LB and see if there's an opportunity to add one for a late round pick. Definitely shop the waiver wire hard. The reality is that LB is almost certainly going to be a weakness for us this year. We weren't fixing our entire roster in one off-season and we're not fixing an overall weak positional group in late July.  If you trade for Lloyd LB is still a weakness and you've given up a young promising WR who could potentially help you answer the question of whether or not Bryce is that guy. That's bad football business.
×
×
  • Create New...