Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to Panthers?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's the kind of dumbsh-t semantics argument I expect from somebody like Sizzlebuzz.

Football decisions should be made by football people for football reasons.

EVERYTHING IS A BINARY!!!!!1!!!

stop posting, your opinions are bad 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joemac said:

LOL you really think Aaron Rodgers is interested in coming to Charlotte of all places to coach up his understudy?  Thats one of the major reasons he wants to leave GB to begin with!  Rodgers doesnt strike me as the "tutor the young guy, so he can take my job" sort of dude.  

Also, next year would cost us like 60 million dollars in QB salary if we kept both Sam and Rodgers.

lol...you quote MY post in this thread as if I was the first to chime in on the idea? its 11 pages long now. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update (such as it is) from Rapoport...

I don't really think he's going anywhere either, but I suppose it's possible.

The interesting question for me, given that the Packers have made a "significant extension offer", is whether it's about the money.

It doesn't seem to be about the money, but you know the old saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

lol...you quote MY post in this thread as if I was the first to chime in on the idea? its 11 pages long now. 

I was specifically commenting on YOUR post about bringing him in on a short term deal to "coach up Darnold."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

You win. You have been successful in beating down my opinion. I dont care but its all good. Congrats on your victory~

Dude WTF are you talking about?  Lighten up, Jesus Christ.....you made a comment - I replied to said comment with my opinion.  Are you aware as to how forums operate?

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

Dude WTF are you talking about?  Lighten up, Jesus Christ.....you made a comment - I replied to said comment with my opinion.  Are you aware as to how forums operate?

Funny how you put that. I made a post and you commented. I replied ( and in my reply i gave you tthe win and victory) and now you say lighten up?  Bro...its not that serious. You already won. You dont need to act like the victim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Funny how you put that. I made a post and you commented. I replied ( and in my reply i gave you tthe win and victory) and now you say lighten up?  Bro...its not that serious. You already won. You dont need to act like the victim. 

You're a weirdo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...