Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Opens up About Carolina (CBS)


 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

When’s it Carolinas turn to open up about Teddy Bridgewater?

Hopefully, Rhule doesn't say anything back. And if he does, just acknowledge and reassure that the coaching staff is moving in the right direction. Pay it no mind and keep focus on Sam.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

They're gonna blame it on Hurney. I would too. But we all know Teddy wouldn't have been here if Rhule and Brady didn't enthusiastically sign off on it.

That's fine and I've already heard that from people inside the org.

The problem is that the Teddy signing doesn't seem like something Hurney would do.  I don't believe it. 

Just like most of the rest of the signings, I believe Teddy was here b/c Joe Brady worked with him in New Orleans.  

This staff signed players they knew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Lol. A professional but he continues to lay out the excuses on why he can’t hit a wide open WR 5 yards away in the end zone with no pressure in his face.

Hey, I got my big boy underwear on and I’m going to get me that 16 TD season that I’ve been dreaming about.

 

I don't think he needs excuses. There's years of tape that shows his limitations. It's on our staff for not seeing it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaLivin said:

I don't think he needs excuses. There's years of tape that shows his limitations. It's on our staff for not seeing it. 

Correct.

Hard to blame a guy who played to the same level he's played at his entire career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Riv said:

 

The problem is that the Teddy signing doesn't seem like something Hurney would do.  I don't believe it. 

Of course it is. Everyone else in the building was talking about a five year plan. Hurney was the one on a one year contract needing a borderline miracle to have any hope of getting an extension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Of course it is. Everyone else in the building was talking about a five year plan. Hurney was the one on a one year contract needing a borderline miracle to have any hope of getting an extension.

Hurney overpaid existing players.  Did he often overpay on the open market?

Joe Brady wanted Teddy because he thought he was legitmately good after they worked together in NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Riv said:

He might end up being a good coach at some point, but it's clear (to me at least) that he's struggling to keep his head above water at this level.

I’m curious why you think he’s struggling to keep his head above water at this level? I’m not saying this dude will for sure work out but I must be missing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

Far from the Patriots, we were a team with new HC, OC and DC with very little pro experience.  Very fair criticism and curious if he brought up the need for more practice to coaches.  Maybe, just maybe our coaches/GM hear this.  He is handling it as well as can be expected, plenty to blame on either side.  Panthers did not throw him under the bus and did all they could to retain his value on the marketplace.   For his sake I hope it stays a two qb race in Denver.

 

You must have lived through a different off-season to me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The perfect response would simply be something along the lines of, "Teddy worked hard here and gave us the heat he had. He's free to say whatever he wants about his time here. Meanwhile, he threw for more redzone TDs last year as a Panther than he has in any other season in his career."

Ok, I concur, that would be a good way to respond. 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Riv said:

He might end up being a good coach at some point, but it's clear (to me at least) that he's struggling to keep his head above water at this level.

He's already a fantastic Head Coach, just ask Baylor or Temple.

What, exactly, about his time in Charlotte has made you question him as a Head Coach?

'Cos I saw him lead a ragtag bunch of young kids and washed up vets to 5 wins. If his QB had taken more of the chances they drew up for him who knows how many more wins he'd have had (this coming from someone who's defended Bridgewater all year). 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

Far from the Patriots, we were a team with new HC, OC and DC with very little pro experience.  Very fair criticism and curious if he brought up the need for more practice to coaches.  

during COVID..... a situation no one has ever experienced in the NFL....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...