Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Post Rookie Mini Camp 53 man Roster Projection


Michael G
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, MrBubba said:

I thought they expanded to 55 🤔

The rule is kind of weird. I'm don't really get it. It seems Teams can have a 55 man roster on game days but only if they move players up from the practice squad at some point (and all those guys can't be active) and they have to choose who every week by a certain time. So its not really a 55 man roster- as for portions of the week those two guys can be snatched off your practice Squad just like everyone else on the PS. Maybe someone else can clarify this for us, but i think I got it basically right.

Edited by Michael G
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Michael G said:

The rule is kind of weird. I'm don't really get it. It seems Teams can have a 55 man roster on game days but only if they move players up from the practice squad at some point (and all those guys can't be active) and they have to choose who every week by a certain time. So its not really a 55 man roster- as for portions of the week those two guys can be snatched off your practice Squad just like everyone else on the PS. Maybe someone else can clarify this for us, but i think I got it basically right.

Its close and Ill add what I know. PS player can only be 54-55 man 4 times a year. You do not have to add any one and the player doesnt need to active on game day. You can protect 2 players per week, starting Monday(I think it may be TuesdaY?). Not take this to the bank, they have have changed some this year. There where different rules last year for convid reasons, no idea if its change back or new, or ????

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh Klein lists Arnold, Tremble, and C. Thompson as the team's TE's. If Ian Thomas is cut then will C. Thompson be the 3rd TE? The other TE's on the roster now include Stephen Sullivan and Giovanni Ricci (a UDFA from last year who was a converted WR). This could be a spot we see Tommy Stevens get some reps too, if he sticks as the 3rd QB and we have injuries later in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pup McBarky said:

It's ridiculously premature.

I started to post the office gif "That's what she said.." to this but figured it had been used so much in the huddle already....i just didn't.. 

Edited by Michael G
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • overall agree on the draft grade as a whole on on each pick, but every time I read (and I have read it more than once) that we "gave up two firsts" for Bryce, I am confused. We gave up the 2024 first, but we swapped 2023 firsts, so we didn't give up anything there. We did give up our former first rounder in DJ, but I don't think thats what you mean as one of the "firsts" we gave up.
    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
×
×
  • Create New...