Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Ranks Panther Roster 27th


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, joemac said:

Seriously...we've got the best RB in the game, a top 10 WR corp, a Top 10 D-Line, the makings of a great secondary...you would think that alone would get us higher than the basement.

I'm not surprised by this rating.   We were rated lower last year, this is an improvement.

And according to PFF, we swapped out for the very worst QB in the league and added the two worst olineman in the league to the left side. 

With Erving and Eiflin on the left and Sam under center, we are essentially giving the finger to pff. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the article in the op:

"The left side of Carolina's offensive line has the potential to be a mess. The Panthers brought in Cameron Erving and Pat Elflein in free agency to compete for the left tackle and left guard jobs, respectively. The only problem with that strategy is that Elflein and Erving both find themselves among the five lowest-graded offensive linemen in the league over the past three seasons. Carolina needs former BYU standout Brady Christensen to take control of one of those jobs, but it remains to be seen if he can stick at tackle with 32.25-inch arms."

"Darnold has been the lowest-graded starting quarterback (63.1) in the NFL since 2018."

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SBBlue said:

I'm not surprised by this rating.   We were rated lower last year, this is an improvement.

And according to PFF, we swapped out for the very worst QB in the league and added the two worst olineman in the league to the left side. 

With Erving and Eiflin on the left and Sam under center, we are essentially giving the finger to pff. 

 

Exactly^  We downgraded in some really important spots based on last years performances.  People need to remember a lot of these type of list are based on last year.  You can't base them off of what you hope happens this year, every team is hoping things get better.

If Sam plays better in our system we will be better.

If Erving or anyone plays better at LT than he has in the past we will be better.

If Elflein plays better we will be better.

If our rookies last year make the normal jump their second year we will be better. 

If a rookie CB plays great his first year we will be better.

Lots of Ifs going on...

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really sure why everyone is so upset about these rankings.

PFF doesn't "have it out" for us, this is just going by the information they have from last year.

The left side of our offensive line was abysmal last year, and we brought in 2 abysmal players to play there and a promising young rookie with short arms.

Our strongest offensive group, our WRs, lost Curtis Samuel.

Our star RB was hurt all last season.

We technically downgraded at QB moving from Bridgewater to Darnold. I know a lot of people are over the moon excited about Darnold, but you're really trading one poison for another if we're just basing this on previous years stats.

We upgraded our defensive line by replacing Short, but we still lacked a lot of pressure from guys not named Burns. In fact, our 2nd leading sack getter left for the Bills in Obada.

We upgraded at LBer, but we're a far cry from having a guy like Kuechly up the middle.

Our secondary got better with Horn, but Jackson was hurt all last season and the rest of the group is nothing to write home about.

Chinn is a wildcard and played well last season, but I'd say we take a hit ratings wise by moving him to FS because you don't know what you're going to get out of him compared to when he was our leading tackler playing closer to the LOS.

This team on paper is better than they were last year, but there is a very real possibility we come out of the season with a similar record to this past season because the talent level simply isn't there yet to make the playoffs and be a solid team.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I would say having us as a bottom 10 roster in terms of talent is very fair. Lots of young players and unknown entities.

Plus, our roster last year was insanely bad. It isn't going to change a huge amount in one offseason.

We just want to be heading in the right direction. That is what matters.

A lot of people get their hackles up on this kind of stuff, but it is a paper exercise.  They are ranking what we look like as a bunch of names, not making a prediction.  Let's hope their post-season wrap up has us ranked better than their pre-season prediction.

I think they probably had us at 34th or 35th last year, behind every NFL team, Alabama, and Clemson.  Maybe Ohio State, too.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

This team on paper is better than they were last year, but there is a very real possibility we come out of the season with a similar record to this past season because the talent level simply isn't there yet to make the playoffs and be a solid team.

 

There's just a lot of prove it guys.  Darnold, Erving, Eiflin have to show improvement.

On D don't forget Bouye, Reddick, Jones, and Fox  and  on O Arnold/Tremble, David Moore  and rookies Marshal and  Shi Smith.

With a low baseline, a ton of change, add some moneyballing and "diamond in the rough" hunting and you get a low score.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got love for ya'll but some of you should lay off the edibles. We have a swiss cheese offensive line until proven otherwise in front of a reclamation project at qb and our star rb already got hurt behind our line last year. This ranking is probably a little too kind all things considered. Youth and an innovative staff is what we have going for us rn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

our star rb already got hurt behind our line last year

Neither injury was actually behind the line.  One was in the endzone, and the other at the firstdown marker.  He wasn't crushed by defensive linemen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Neither injury was actually behind the line.  One was in the endzone, and the other at the firstdown marker.  He wasn't crushed by defensive linemen.

All those touches result in hits that have a cumulative effect just ask our last qb (#1).

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, SBBlue said:

There's just a lot of prove it guys.  Darnold, Erving, Eiflin have to show improvement.

On D don't forget Bouye, Reddick, Jones, and Fox  and  on O Arnold/Tremble, David Moore  and rookies Marshal and  Shi Smith.

With a low baseline, a ton of change, add some moneyballing and "diamond in the rough" hunting and you get a low score.

And for a lot of those positions, nothing bothers me with having "just prove it" guys brought in.

My problem with the guys they bring in on the offensive line to "just prove it" is that we've been doing it every year since Jordan Gross left. 

The lack of attention to the offensive line makes the Panthers look more like a team worried about selling Jersey's in the short term, than wins in the long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2021 at 11:51 AM, Madwolf said:

Not really sure why everyone is so upset about these rankings.

PFF doesn't "have it out" for us, this is just going by the information they have from last year.

The left side of our offensive line was abysmal last year, and we brought in 2 abysmal players to play there and a promising young rookie with short arms.

Our strongest offensive group, our WRs, lost Curtis Samuel.

Our star RB was hurt all last season.

We technically downgraded at QB moving from Bridgewater to Darnold. I know a lot of people are over the moon excited about Darnold, but you're really trading one poison for another if we're just basing this on previous years stats.

We upgraded our defensive line by replacing Short, but we still lacked a lot of pressure from guys not named Burns. In fact, our 2nd leading sack getter left for the Bills in Obada.

We upgraded at LBer, but we're a far cry from having a guy like Kuechly up the middle.

Our secondary got better with Horn, but Jackson was hurt all last season and the rest of the group is nothing to write home about.

Chinn is a wildcard and played well last season, but I'd say we take a hit ratings wise by moving him to FS because you don't know what you're going to get out of him compared to when he was our leading tackler playing closer to the LOS.

This team on paper is better than they were last year, but there is a very real possibility we come out of the season with a similar record to this past season because the talent level simply isn't there yet to make the playoffs and be a solid team.

 

Talent and maybe even more so, experience. We are leaning heavily on VERY young players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...