Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: No movement in Panthers’ talks w/ Taylor Moton


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Tagging a player doesn't make then happy. Tagging them twice is a good formula for them to sit out a year and them go to the highest bidder.

😂 you're joking right? No way that happens stop being an idiot.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, panthers55 said:

 Tagging them twice is a good formula for them to sit out a year and them go to the highest bidder.

"Bidding" by other teams isn't an option after year-2 of tagging.

0.00% chance Moton sits out a year and even if he did he'd still be obligated to play for the Panthers if they chose to tag him for a 3rd season.

Next!

 

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2021 at 2:04 PM, ladypanther said:

That's a problem here.  People saying things about people that they just make up. Next person takes it as truth  and....

Give me a break. It's been said on here ad nauseam in multiple threads, so after year of it you ask me for a source and say I'm making it up? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

"Bidding" by other teams isn't an option after year-2 of tagging.

0.00% chance Moton sits out a year and even if he did he'd still be obligated to play for the Panthers if they chose to tag him for a 3rd season.

Next!

 

There are 2 types of tags, exclusive and nonexclusive tags so no it isn't automatic that no one else can get involved. Secondly Bell sat out when he was franchised twice recently so it isn't 0% that Moton would do the same. Finally he is going to be signed longterm so this is not worth going back and forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

"Bidding" by other teams isn't an option after year-2 of tagging.

0.00% chance Moton sits out a year and even if he did he'd still be obligated to play for the Panthers if they chose to tag him for a 3rd season.

Next!

 

Only if you apply the exclusive tag and again that has only happened a few times in league history and isn't going to happen here so not worth the arguing until he at least plays one year on the tag.

Plus Le'Veon Bell sat out recently so 0% is an opinion and not fact at all.

Edited by panthers55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Only if you apply the exclusive tag and again that has only happened a few times in league history and isn't going to happen here so not worth the arguing until he at least plays one year on the tag.

Plus Le'Veon Bell sat out recently so 0% is an opinion and not fact at all.

And since a player holding out wouldn't have signed their franchise tag agreement they don't have to pay anything back and wouldn't be under contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

link: Which Franchise-Tagged NFL Stars Will Get Extensions Ahead of July Deadline? | Bleacher Report | Latest News, Videos and Highlights

"

Carolina Panthers OT Taylor Moton

This one might have become a little trickier when the New Orleans Saints reset the right tackle market by handing Ryan Ramczyk a five-year, $96 million extension last month. The question is if Moton thinks he's worth something similar, because that would be a problem. Ramczyk has been an All-Pro, and he's missed just one start in four NFL seasons since coming into the league as a first-round pick in 2017. 

Moton was a second-rounder that year, and he simply isn't quite on Ramczyk's level. There's a big gap between Ramczyk, Lane Johnson and every other right tackle in terms of average annual salary, and that could be a problem if the Panthers feel something in Jack Conklin's $14 million range is fair while Moton expects to fill that gap between Conklin and Johnson (who makes $18 million a year). 

With so much up in the air right now as Sam Darnold comes to town, I'm not sure Carolina is willing to fork over more than $14 million per season when Moton will make close to that on the tag. This might lead to one more prove-it year. 

Prediction: The tag remains in place

"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina was a pushover on their last two big money contracts. Now they want to play hardball with their best offensive tackle when they have a patchwork offensive line already? Not a great look.

Edited by frankw
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Carolina was a pushover on their last two big money contracts. Now they want to play hardball with their best offensive tackle when they have a patchwork offensive line already? Not a great look.

 

Slow your role a bit there grasshopper. There is a new Sheriff in town. This Sheriff has yet to handle any big time contracts. Maybe we can, oh I don't know, let him deal with this one first before we decide if he lives or dies? 

 

Blame the past regime for their ineptitude, then project that onto the new regime, then call it a bad look. lol You can't make this shitt up. Well apparently you can, but wow, just wow.

 

Also, I really liked how you just know we are playing Hard Ball with Moton. Making shitt up to prove a point. Unfortunately, that happens a good deal here in Huddle-Land.

 

If I could bottle Patience, I'd sell it on the Huddle. Man, we'd all be living in the Bahamas'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Slow your role a bit there grasshopper. There is a new Sheriff in town. This Sheriff has yet to handle any big time contracts. Maybe we can, oh I don't know, let him deal with this one first before we decide if he lives or dies? 

 

Blame the past regime for their ineptitude, then project that onto the new regime, then call it a bad look. lol You can't make this shitt up. Well apparently you can, but wow, just wow.

 

Also, I really liked how you just know we are playing Hard Ball with Moton. Making shitt up to prove a point. Unfortunately, that happens a good deal here in Huddle-Land.

 

If I could bottle Patience, I'd sell it on the Huddle. Man, we'd all be living in the Bahamas'.

We can skip the back and forth theatrics this go around. Let me ask you straight up. Are you concerned about left tackle? There is nothing wrong with being apprehensive at the sight of Carolina repeating the same approach that has given us one good season of left tackle play (2015) in a decade.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

We can skip the back and forth theatrics this go around. Let me ask you straight up. Are you concerned about left tackle? There is nothing wrong with being apprehensive at the sight of Carolina repeating the same approach that has given us one good season of left tackle play (2015) in a decade.

 

You keep harping on past Panther sins. Then projecting those sins on the present regime. Don't fret, you are no where near the only Huddler doing this.

 

Take a look at the CB room. Last year it was not very talented. This year it is a team strength. How come you never bring this fact up as a positive for the new regime? Because it is not a negative per chance?

 

The Dline 2 years ago was abysmal. This year it is a Beast. That is all on this regime. 

 

We have no idea what the Oline is going to look like game 1. I will wait to decide if I am angry, or pleasantly surprised, once I see how they play. 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

You keep harping on past Panther sins. Then projecting those sins on the present regime. Don't fret, you are no where near the only Huddler doing this.

 

Take a look at the CB room. Last year it was not very talented. This year it is a team strength. How come you never bring this fact up as a positive for the new regime? Because it is not a negative per chance?

 

The Dline 2 years ago was abysmal. This year it is a Beast. That is all on this regime. 

 

We have no idea what the Oline is going to look like game 1. I will wait to decide if I am angry, or pleasantly surprised, once I see how they play. 

I get the logic you are trying to go with but it doesn't compute. We have invested three 1sts and two 2nds in the secondary and defensive line recently. The defense better look improved for that level of cost. Do you remember the last time Carolina drafted an offensive lineman in the first? Jeff Otah in 2008.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...