Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on QB (Darnold) & my translation.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, SBBlue said:

Wow.  More praise for Payton.  Mancrush much?

You think me acknowledging that makes me happy? I'm not carrying water for anyone until they show us they will show up and punch that zoolander fool in the mouth. You just can't handle anything but unanimous praise. Sorry that isn't how life works.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

Then he gave 34M guaranteed(and a 3rd round comp pick) for a “bridge” QB? For what QB was he “bridging” the team to. That’s even worse than just mis-judging Teddy’s talent. 
 

   And the Saints didn’t trade Teddy. He was a FA. Don’t let facts get in the way of a good rant. 

Is that the same guy who said the Packers were being managed for the benefit of their "stockholders"..?

Or was that someone else who was simply making it up on the fly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

It's ok.  There's no need to hide your feelings.  Let em out frank. 

How did the Panthers look with Teddy chumming it up with his old pals on the sideline while we were getting trounced late in the game? You can drink all the koolaid you want but this mgmt has a lot to prove in '21 and it begins with a revenge tour.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, frankw said:

@beo truth hurts huh?

The truth has nothing to do with your post, although it's pretty funny that a reaction on a message board would make you respond in such a way. I poo'd because a large part of this fanbase in general has this odd obsession with the Saints to an unhealthy degree. Do you really think that Sean Payton sits in his office all day conjuring up ways to screw over the Panthers? I truthfully wonder if half of you don't just view him as some sort of mustache twirling cartoon super villain.

I remember whenever we beat them last that there was some theory that they had rested our starters just to fug our draft position. Not saying you said this, but it's a strange phenomenon for a team that has less winning seasons since our inception than many 2nd place teams do in other divisions.

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, beo said:

The truth has nothing to do with your post, although it's pretty funny that a reaction on a message board would make you respond in such a way. I poo'd because a large part of this fanbase in general has this odd obsession with the Saints to an unhealthy degree. Do you really think that Sean Payton sits in his office all day conjuring up ways to screw over the Panthers? I truthfully wonder if half of you don't just view him as some sort of mustache twirling cartoon super villain.

I remember whenever we beat them last that there was some theory that they had rested our starters just to fug our draft position. Not saying you said this, but it's a strange phenomenon for a team that has less winning seasons since our inception than many 2nd place teams do in other divisions.

They're champions. The Bucs are champs. Even the Falcons almost won it all before us. If there is an odd obsession anyone has in this fanbase of a team without back to back winning seasons it's getting back to the big game and bringing a title to the Carolinas. If inconvenient truths hit you in the feels it's because you hate to admit it. The Saints and Bucs are the teams to beat if we want to return to league relevancy and contention. Is sitting around singing our own praises and ignoring faults going to get us anywhere in the short or long term? If you find solace in the best current teams in our division being awful half a century ago I guess slow clap for you. Some of us want more.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, CRA said:

Rhule didn't win in college with great QB play.    He has never relied on it.  Two years into his NFL career he appears to be sticking with his same formula.  Prioritize defense

 

 

If he hadn't,  I'd have to assume he doesn't know how to build a winner. 

 

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, beo said:

The truth has nothing to do with your post, although it's pretty funny that a reaction on a message board would make you respond in such a way. I poo'd because a large part of this fanbase in general has this odd obsession with the Saints to an unhealthy degree. Do you really think that Sean Payton sits in his office all day conjuring up ways to screw over the Panthers? I truthfully wonder if half of you don't just view him as some sort of mustache twirling cartoon super villain.

I remember whenever we beat them last that there was some theory that they had rested our starters just to fug our draft position. Not saying you said this, but it's a strange phenomenon for a team that has less winning seasons since our inception than many 2nd place teams do in other divisions.

Well, there have been reports that draft jockeying directly related to the Saints and Panthers have been a thing! Regardless of whether you want to acknowledge it, human nature as opposed to just business, at least on their part, seems to have played a part in their dealings.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/04/30/saints-made-a-spite-trade-to-draft-a-fourth-quarterback/amp/

https://www.si.com/nfl/saints/news/saints-stevens-payton-trolls-panthers-nfl

And call it all business if you want, but if there hadn't been some serious gamesmanship on our part, then Terrace Marshall would be a Saint.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/05/08/panthers-drafted-terrace-marshall-at-no-59-after-hearing-saints-wanted-him-at-no-60/

If you think it doesn't feel good to Payton to screw us, and for us to effectively screw them, then you don't quite know how the world works.

And, by the way, fug the Saints!

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

If he hadn't,  I'd have to assume he doesn't know how to build a winner. 

 

Why, because he began with defense? 

You have to build a winner situationally, point, blank and period!

You can't be so dogmatic about philosophies and theories that you miss the forest for the trees! That's how Gettleman did things. Hurney may have tried to build situationally, but he was god-awful at it on the personnel side (outside of the first round).

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

some huddlers: Its Rhule's fault!

This is just silly. Matt Rhule has maybe a handful of consistent critics here at any given moment usually. It's not even in the same ballpark as the nuclear fallout the mention of Rivera's name brought here on a regular basis. Most by an overwhelming margin want to see what he can do this season. If it is more of the same there will be questions like any other sport or any other coach. I do not expect that to be the case though. He hasn't looked haggard in front of the media lately because he is taking any of this lightly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, frankw said:

They're champions. The Bucs are champs. Even the Falcons almost won it all before us. If there is an odd obsession anyone has in this fanbase of a team without back to back winning seasons it's getting back to the big game and bringing a title to the Carolinas. If inconvenient truths hit you in the feels it's because you hate to admit it. The Saints and Bucs are the teams to beat if we want to return to league relevancy and contention. Is sitting around singing our own praises and ignoring faults going to get us anywhere in the short or long term? If you find solace in the best current teams in our division being awful half a century ago I guess slow clap for you. Some of us want more.

Honestly man I had just woke up and felt a little grouchy when I reacted; I didn't read the rest of the conversation up to that point so I'll just own it because I clearly misunderstood most of the conversation seeing as I was vehemently against the move to sign Teddy even when it happened and almost nothing you've said here in this response applies to my beliefs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...