Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What the Indianapolis Colts media is saying about the joint practice


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Except it was Bell that played LT, not Chandler, who was on the right side. Don't let fact get in the way of a good burn though.

You’re strengthening my case. I was pretty sure Nate spent some time at left tackle, but could be wrong. But just the fact that you had both of them on the same line says it all

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, socalfan said:

Hey guys...first post here.   My son played with Sam at USC and they were roommates for two years.  How has Sam looked so far?

Hey, welcome to the party.  

Sam's started rough.  He looked pretty good last week.  Yesterday was mixed.  He's in a new offense and style of ball, so there's going to be bumps.

Teddy's first year in the offense at the Satins, he lost to our backup Kyle Allen, so.....

Ignore the haters here and you'll be fine.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AceBoogie said:

You’re strengthening my case. I was pretty sure Nate spent some time at left tackle, but could be wrong. But just the fact that you had both of them on the same line says it all

 

The problem is, that was not this regime. That was the past. Let go of the past, it only impedes your forward progression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

I’m not only concerned with the obvious lack of talent on the line but also the lack of a team leader who guys will rally around. Seems like there is a lack of intensity and nobody is setting the tone.

Gonna be another long year. As long as Tepper owns this team I’m not going to be optimistic that they will be any good. He has basically shown zero evidence of being a competent owner.  That includes the coaching hires.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...