Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question...what if P.J is better then S D?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 It’s pretty straightforward. Busts didn’t get 2nd contracts. Pretty simple. Wentz(who I forgot) is like Tannehill and Goff. All played well enough for the team that drafted them to invest a franchise QB deal in them. And I still didn’t include them in either list. 
 

   As opposed to whatever jumble of reasoning you just put out there. My parameters are very clear. You have a better measurement. Please share with us all. Not a single data point. A large sample size.

Oh.  I didn't realize our whole goal was to find a QB that could earn a 2nd contract.   Carry on then.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

I'm enjoying this banter. 🙃

When we get to actual football season some of the TB aholes rear their ugly head.    I put him on ignore, tired of looking at his ugly ass stealers ring.  He can feel free to rail away like an idiot against the mute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

When we get to actual football season some of the TB aholes rear their ugly head.    I put him on ignore, tired of looking at his ugly ass stealers ring.  He can feel free to rail away like an idiot against the mute.

 Never been to the TB and whatever keeps you happy and delusional, you should do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

While Rhule also added that he’s undecided on if the team’s starters will be a go, it’ll be nice (and fair) to see Grier at least work with the likes of Terrace Marshall Jr., Omar Bayless and Tommy Tremble, as P.J. Walker did in his largely positive performance

That last part...lol

All this proves they rather go with Grier>Darnold

 

mad-angry.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

While Rhule also added that he’s undecided on if the team’s starters will be a go, it’ll be nice (and fair) to see Grier at least work with the likes of Terrace Marshall Jr., Omar Bayless and Tommy Tremble, as P.J. Walker did in his largely positive performance

That last part...lol

All this proves they rather go with Grier>Darnold

 

mad-angry.gif

It was largely positive because the expectations from last season were dirt low. They are literally saying 10/21 is a positive performance for him.

Darnold is the starter, not going to change unless somebody gets injured. 
 

Grier/Walker are both below average back up QBs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

It was largely positive because the expectations from last season were dirt low. They are literally saying 10/21 is a positive performance for him.

Darnold is the starter, not going to change unless somebody gets injured. 
 

Grier/Walker are both below average back up QBs.

Question: When is Darnold going actually start ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

Question: When is Darnold going actually start ????

Weeks 1-17 of the regular season. That is typically when starting QBs play. This reduces the chances of losing your starting QB to injury during the preseason and increases your chances of success by starting your most qualified signal caller during the games that impact your record.

Now since that has been explained, let’s take a second to address your grammar on that post.

”Question: When is Darnold going actually start ????”

The correct way to ask this question would be “When do you think Darnold is going to actually start?” OR “I have a question, when is Darnold going to start?”

Phrasing is this way makes it easier for the reader. Also there is an excess of punctuation that is not necessary.

Edited by Cdparr7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

It was largely positive because the expectations from last season were dirt low. They are literally saying 10/21 is a positive performance for him.

Darnold is the starter, not going to change unless somebody gets injured. 
 

Grier/Walker are both below average back up QBs.

PJ Walker lead the offense to 4 scoring drives in a half.  Pretty sure that is positive, especially given it was the first action on the year and he only has 1 NFL start to his name. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

PJ Walker lead the offense to 4 scoring drives in a half.  Pretty sure that is positive, especially given it was the first action on the year and he only has 1 NFL start to his name. 

And don't forget Darnold's getting all the practice reps, so he had very few chances to prove himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...